Can't make this stuff up. Tech foul

[fullor30]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

I don't think it's that big of a deal for a player to pull off the pants of another player, as long as it's not followed by "illegal use of hands".

You mean a reach in foul?

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

I don't think it's that big of a deal for a player to pull off the pants of another player, as long as it's not followed by "illegal use of hands".

Mark:

Just two questions:

1) What is Mr. Weaselpants's first name?

2) Are you off your meds again.

Signed: Marcia Tomasina DeNucci (Read your 48 foul thread.)

MTD, Sr.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Mark:

Just two questions:

1) What is Mr. Weaselpants's first name?

2) Are you off your meds again.

Signed: Marcia Tomasina DeNucci (Read your 48 foul thread.)

MTD, Sr.

1) Skippy

2) I can't tell (that should tell you something)

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by fullor30

You mean a reach in foul?

Or worse - over the back!

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Coach was right; you were wrong.

A live-ball contact foul has to be a personal foul of some kind by definition. See Rule 4-19-1. You have your choice of a common, shooting, intentional or flagrant personal foul. An intentional personal foul seems like the best option to me as the player wasn't making a legitimate attempt to play the ball(Rule 4-19-3).

Technical fouls are defined under rule 4-19-5. Note that live-ball technical fouls are by definition a non-contact foul by a player(R4-19-5).

Shoot 2 FT's with no one lined up and team A then gets a throw-in at the closest spot to B1's foul.

Rules rulz!

Thank you. Good to have your voice of reason back.