Excessive Tiimeout -- No Official Notification

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

it is not an infraction of the rules for a player to continue to participate in the game after being disqualified and the player and his coach is not notified.

It absolutely is a technical foul to participate after being disqualified. The technical is charged directly to the head coach. 10-5-3.

However, if the head coach is never notified of a player's 5th foul, then the player is not disqualified. 4-14-2.

So your statement above should read: "it is not an infraction of the rules for a player to continue to participate in the game after accumulating his 5th foul or 2nd technical foul, as long as his coach has not been notified".

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by jdw3018

Yes, this was administered correctly.

I would have done at least one thing differently. I would have assessed an unsporting technical foul to the coach of Team B for his poor behavior. That would mean that each team gets charged with a technical foul and we can either consider them to be simultaneous and offset or we can shoot them in the order in which they occurred. That should take care of the problem.

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

It absolutely is a technical foul to participate after being disqualified. The technical is charged directly to the head coach. 10-5-3.

However, if the head coach is never notified of a player's 5th foul, then the player is not disqualified. 4-14-2.

So your statement above should read: "it is not an infraction of the rules for a player to continue to participate in the game after accumulating his 5th foul or 2nd technical foul, as long as his coach has not been notified".

I concur. Terminology is important.

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

It absolutely is a technical foul to participate after being disqualified. The technical is charged directly to the head coach. 10-5-3.

However, if the head coach is never notified of a player's 5th foul, then the player is not disqualified. 4-14-2.

So your statement above should read: "it is not an infraction of the rules for a player to continue to participate in the game after accumulating his 5th foul or 2nd technical foul, as long as his coach has not been notified".

Scrapper1:

I thought what you said is what I said.

MTD, Sr.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Scrapper1:

I thought what you said is what I said.

As my sister would say, "But no, though."

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

As my sister would say, "But no, though."

Scrapper1:

I agree with your OP, but I knew what I said, and I thought you understood Ohio English.

MTD, Sr.

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Scrapper1:

I agree with your OP, but I knew what I said, and I thought you understood Ohio English.

MTD, Sr.

I have it that some folks in the Pittsburgh area refer to this dialect as "Ohesian." Like they should talk.

Not to hijack, but I have a question similar to this regarding the 5th player coming on the floor late. Look for the thread.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

It absolutely is a technical foul to participate after being disqualified. The technical is charged directly to the head coach. 10-5-3.

Penalized if discovered while being violated: The head coach shall not permit a team member to participate after being removed from the game for disqualification. Head coach direct technical foul.