The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 11, 2008, 03:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
I agree with rwest on this.

Me, too.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 11, 2008, 03:25pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Sure ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by fiasco View Post
Any contact after the fact is ignored.
How about intentional, or flagrant contact?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 11, 2008, 04:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,022
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
How about intentional, or flagrant contact?
Good call. I meant common foul. Besides, I was wrong anyway!!!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 11, 2008, 05:47pm
I got a Basketball Jones!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Hunger
Posts: 937
Unhappy Lotta good its doing them.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch1town View Post
Seems as though some of the folks need to visit their online rules resource a little more often.

Take a look at some of the 'you make the call' poll results posted on their site...Not so sure I would want this info publicly available

This question was posted 1/15/2008

Results for "A1 has the ball in the backcourt and throws a pass into the front court. The ball strikes the official who is in bounds in the front court and the ball rolls into the backcourt and is first touched by A1."
Choice Votes %
Back court violation 318 50.1%
No violation - count continues 228 35.9%
No violation - count restarts 69 10.8%
Traveling 19 2.9%
Total 634 100%



Same question posted 9/15/2004

Results for "Team A is in backcourt - passes ball - hits Referee in frontcourt inbounds - goes directly into backcourt - A1 catches the ball."
Created 21:17 09/15/2004
Choice Votes %
Backcourt Violation 75 50.3%
OK. No Break in Ten Second Count. 47 31.5%
OK. Ten Second Count Starts Over. 19 12.7%
OK. But A1 Cannot Dribble. 8 5.3%
Total 149 100%


But at least they are consistent with 50% getting correct answer in both instances

more 'interesting' results can be found at this link...
Middle Tennessee Basketball Officials Association
__________________
Lah me..
(In honor of Jurassic Ref, R.I.P.)
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 11, 2008, 05:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lincoln Co, Missouri
Posts: 823
Since the OP asked

NCAA - count the bucket, Team A wins
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 11, 2008, 08:35pm
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 22,934
Free Or Cheap ???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ch1town View Post
I'm still looking for alternative free online rulebook to the one above. Or, what's the cheapest way to get an online rulebook and casebook if I end up having to pay for it? NFHS? How much? EOfficials.com?
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 11, 2008, 09:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
NFHS
A. PC foul. Doesn't matter that the ball is dead. The foul is still penalized and as part of that penalty the basket does not count. Get ready for OT.

B. If the ball has become dead prior to the contact because the try ended, then the foul is ignored unless the contact is intentional or flagrant. If the ball was still live because the try was not yet finished, then the foul is to be penalized, but it is NOT a PC foul and the goal counts. You could go to the other end and award bonus FTs with no time on the clock.

NCAAW = same as NFHS

NCAAM
A. This is not a PC foul. Therefore, the goal counts.
I'll research how to handle the contact.

B. Same as NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 04:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 93
wouldnt that be a pc and the ball is just waved off, no matter if it goes in or not...its still a pc
__________________
I may be young but I am NOT a rookie
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 08:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post

NCAAM
A. This is not a PC foul. Therefore, the goal counts.
I'll research how to handle the contact.
would you not just count the bucket and head for the lockers? obviously you would have a foul on A1, but since the contact happened after the release, you count the bucket and you can't shoot any free throws because of the fact it is a team control foul, so that's the ballgame. you don't ignore the contact, but the contact in this situation becomes irrelevant as no free throws can come of it.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 09:00am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockchalk jhawk View Post
would you not just count the bucket and head for the lockers? obviously you would have a foul on A1, but since the contact happened after the release, you count the bucket and you can't shoot any free throws because of the fact it is a team control foul, so that's the ballgame. you don't ignore the contact, but the contact in this situation becomes irrelevant as no free throws can come of it.
There's TC after a try has been released? Alert Ed Bilik because the rule book needs to be changed to reflect this "new interp."
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 09:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,994
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockchalk jhawk View Post
would you not just count the bucket and head for the lockers? obviously you would have a foul on A1, but since the contact happened after the release, you count the bucket and you can't shoot any free throws because of the fact it is a team control foul, so that's the ballgame. you don't ignore the contact, but the contact in this situation becomes irrelevant as no free throws can come of it.
It's not a PC or TC foul, sir. The ball was released on a try for goal ending both player and team control.

I'm not sure that the NCAAM rules contain a provision similar to the NFHS rules which provides for penalizing a foul BY an airborne shooter while the ball is dead. I believe so, but since I'm not sure, I said that I would research it rather than post something that turns out to be incorrect, which is what you have just done.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 10:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
It's not a PC or TC foul, sir. The ball was released on a try for goal ending both player and team control.

I'm not sure that the NCAAM rules contain a provision similar to the NFHS rules which provides for penalizing a foul BY an airborne shooter while the ball is dead. I believe so, but since I'm not sure, I said that I would research it rather than post something that turns out to be incorrect, which is what you have just done.

OK, excuse me as I used the wrong terminology when I said TC. But the fact remains that in NCAAM you can count the bucket if the try is released before the crash happens, have a foul on A1 for fouling B1 who had legal position, and give the ball to B1. I called that a TC foul, which you are correct it is not. I'm not sure what 'name' you'd give to that type of foul, my apologies.

You know, I'm here trying to provide my input on discussion to a legitimate question so that I can learn and have some knowledge in case such a situation arises in the future. You, sir, are being less than constructive in pointing out that what I posted wasn't correct. The point of this forum is to expand our knowledge, not to act better than thou... What do I gain in coming here and trying to contribute to the discussion if you're going to be such a prick when you point out the fairly innocent mistake in conversation? I may have a low post count, but I've lurked here for years and this isn't the first time this has been pointed out to you. Yes, you have a great knowledge of the written rules, congratulations. Try to be a little more humble about it.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 11:24am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
If it's not a TC or PC foul, it would be a common foul. We're still waiting on Nevada's research about this call.

These distinctions matter to calling the game correctly. Nevada is zealous about respecting the rules and pointing out sloppiness, but it's up to you whether you take that personally.

And, he did call you "sir".
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 11:38am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by rockchalk jhawk View Post
OK, excuse me as I used the wrong terminology when I said TC. But the fact remains that in NCAAM you can count the bucket if the try is released before the crash happens, have a foul on A1 for fouling B1 who had legal position, and give the ball to B1. I called that a TC foul, which you are correct it is not. I'm not sure what 'name' you'd give to that type of foul, my apologies.
I'm not going to defend his post, but Nevada is right that it matters what you call this. It's not just semantics, in that since you thought it was a TC foul, you thought free throws would not be attempted. That's the important distinction with a TC foul.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 12, 2008, 12:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells View Post
I'm not going to defend his post, but Nevada is right that it matters what you call this. It's not just semantics, in that since you thought it was a TC foul, you thought free throws would not be attempted. That's the important distinction with a TC foul.
I did call it the wrong thing. I never meant to imply that free throws would be shot. I'm not sure without looking, but I think I even said somehwere that free throws would not be shot. Tough to convey over written word, but I've understood from the get-go that in a shot release followed by a crash situation that you can count the bucket (NCAAM) but have a foul on A and give ball to B. What exactly do you call that type of foul? We've established it's not a PC or TC.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simultaneous foul w/ bucket - what is POI? Mendy Trent Basketball 16 Fri Oct 24, 2008 10:41pm
LSU game offensive foul dave30 Basketball 21 Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:18pm
Foul-buzzer-shot BloggingRefGuy Basketball 17 Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:48am
Foul situation...game jcurtin Basketball 8 Tue Feb 01, 2005 12:17am
offensive foul - count the bucket ??? GA ref Basketball 18 Thu Jun 17, 2004 02:28am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:47am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1