|
|||
Double foul and shot clock horn
This is a question from the NCAA test. We went over it and over last night, but without a real resolution.
A1 releases a try. B2 and A2 foul each other. The shot clock horn sounds. A1's try fails to hit the rim. Enforce the fouls and then what? Go to the arrow? Penalize the shot clock violation? Since the whistle blew for the double foul, the shot clock should not have sounded, even though the ball remains live. That leads me to believe that we go to the arrow. Others thought that since the ball is live and the shot clock horn did sound, you have a violation, and the POI is the penalty for the violation. I looked through the case book and couldn't find a real match to the situation. Anybody have a clear reference? |
|
|||
Quote:
So my take would be that POI would be the awarding of the ball OOB for the shot clock violation. After all, you have to ask yourself: What would have happened if there had been no interruption. I would imagine this would be a similar in enforcement to if there were a double foul, with a try in flight, and then the offense commits BI.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
But they shouldn't have. If the clock stopped properly, the shot clock horn would not have sounded. Does that make a difference?
|
|
|||
Quote:
I don't see in the rules where the shot clock stops on a try, which would be one reason to consider why it maybe should have stopped. It would stop and reset on a single foul, which is not the case here. so that's not relevant. It would stop and then continue at the POI on a double foul when there is team control, which there isn't in this scenario. Am I missing something? Edited to add: Hmmm, except that by 5-10-1 it should stop on a foul. Which is without qualification.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming Last edited by Back In The Saddle; Tue Nov 04, 2008 at 12:24pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
The game clock and shot clock should stop on the whistle for the foul. If the horn sounds after the foul/whistle, then the clock didn't get stopped correctly. Time should be restored to both the game clock and shot clock. Therefore, I believe that no shot clock violation has really occured. However, at the time of the foul, there was no team control (try in the air that was unsuccessful) which means possession is determined by the arrow....regardless of the time on the clock. You go with the arrow and, if team A has the possession arrow, you leave the clock at the restored time (with an imminent shot clock violation likely)
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association Last edited by Camron Rust; Tue Nov 04, 2008 at 02:49pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
So in this scenario, it seems we have a try in flight and a live ball when the double foul occurs. But the horn has sounded, so we don't have the stopping the clock issues in the OP. The ball becomes dead when the try ends. Penalize the double foul, POI is the AP arrow.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming Last edited by Back In The Saddle; Tue Nov 04, 2008 at 05:46pm. |
|
|||
Why is the POI the shot clock violation? If the timer had done his job properly, there wouldn't be a shot clock violation. Right? I'm sure you're right. I just don't know why we extend the POI to a point where the clock should already have been stopped.
|
|
|||
Quote:
I think the rationale by the NCAA is not to bail out the offense out of what would be a clear violation had the double foul not occurred. So you have 3 possible scenarios:
The answer Brad gave is definitely correct.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Wed Nov 05, 2008 at 11:06am. |
|
|||
I agree with Scrapper -- It's the same question we've always had about the clock stopping "properly" at other than "near the end of the game" (or maybe even then, in non-monitor games). I think that the answer was / is that there really is "lag time".
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
shot, foul, horn.... | ronny mulkey | Basketball | 8 | Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:16pm |
Double foul shot clock issue | CA BBall Ref | Basketball | 1 | Sun Jan 22, 2006 09:17am |
Foul, horn, shot | ChuckElias | Basketball | 5 | Wed Nov 30, 2005 07:18pm |
double foul - MA shot clock ? | mdray | Basketball | 1 | Fri Nov 18, 2005 11:06am |
Zero on the clock....No horn yet! | Rev.Ref63 | Basketball | 16 | Thu Dec 13, 2001 12:33pm |