|
|||
One More Time ...
If you believe that the disconcertion ion caused the violation, blow the whistle, and do it again. If you don't believe that the disconcertion caused the violation, no basket if successful, go to the arrow.
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16) “I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36) |
|
|||
Quote:
Would I still blow the whistle in the 2nd scenario?
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Scrappy, I'm not sure I follow the question? Penalty 4 c. seems to cover it: B1 disconcerted, A1 violated, so A1 gets a substitute FT. Is your question about what if A1 actually made the first FT? Would you wipe it off and make them shoot it again?
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
NFHS 9-1 Penalties: 4. If there is a violation first by the free-thrower's opponent followed by the free thrower or a teammate:
c. If a violation by the free thrower follows disconcertion by an opponent, a substitute free throw shall be awarded. It sounds like you have a simultaneous violation because the shooter entered the lane early. Entering the lane early is not a situation you can reasonably "blame" on disconcertion. So blow that shot dead, regardless of whether it is made or missed, and award a replacement throw. 9.1.3.G seems to back this up.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
Ok, So the free thower gets another FT. Kinda like an offside penalty in FB?
__________________
truerookie Last edited by truerookie; Thu Oct 23, 2008 at 01:54pm. |
|
|||
The OP specifically said, "B1 disconcerts the free thrower." So, penalty C applies, and the free-thrower gets another chance.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Correct about that one, I stand corrected go to the table.
__________________
truerookie |
|
|||
Quote:
My statement was meant to convey that I don't believe this to be a situation where you ignore the second violation just because the first one happened.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
Go to the table? As in use the arrow?
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming |
|
|||
Yeah, BITS that was my initial response and TJ was pointing out to me about the Jump Ball happening once or twice depending on if we go into overtime. In the situation, the FT'er is entitled to another FT due to the disconcertion
__________________
truerookie |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Violations.....or not? | Illini_Ref | Basketball | 19 | Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:08am |
Lane Violations | force39 | Basketball | 8 | Sun Jun 20, 2004 06:11pm |
backcourt violations | C | Basketball | 2 | Thu Sep 25, 2003 10:33am |
backcourt violations | ref5 | Basketball | 16 | Wed Sep 10, 2003 07:12pm |
Lane Violations | rainmaker | Basketball | 10 | Thu Mar 20, 2003 08:11am |