Two violations

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Quote:"Always listen to Bob."

I would agree. But sometimes he's a man of too few words.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

I would agree. But sometimes he's a man of too few words.

Two secrets to success:

1) Don't tell everything you know.

[M&M Guy]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Two secrets to success:

1) Don't tell everything you know.

That's awful binary of you.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

That's awful binary of you.

When are we going to start talking about signed binary numbers!?

You know...

3-bit
-2 is 110

-or-

4-bit
-2 is 1110

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

NFHS 9-1 Penalties: 4. If there is a violation first by the free-thrower's opponent followed by the free thrower or a teammate:
c. If a violation by the free thrower follows disconcertion by an opponent, a substitute free throw shall be awarded.

I just thought it was interesting that ANY violation that follows disconcertion is ignored; even if the second violation can't reasonably be "blamed" on the disconcertion.

Disconcertion -> Early entry = Replacement free throw.

Seems like it should be a double violation, but it's not.

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by tjones1

When are we going to start talking about signed binary numbers!?

You know...

3-bit
-2 is 110

-or-

4-bit
-2 is 1110

One's complemt or two's complement?

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Two secrets to success:

1) Don't tell everything you know.

Good thing I don't drink coffee in the morning; I'd need a new monitor.

Thanks for the laugh!

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

I just thought it was interesting that ANY violation that follows disconcertion is ignored; even if the second violation can't reasonably be "blamed" on the disconcertion.

Disconcertion -> Early entry = Replacement free throw.

Seems like it should be a double violation, but it's not.

I guess I was reading it wrong. I was reading simultaneous violation as well (or double violation in NCAA). Or am I? penalty "c" only says "a substitute free throw shall be awarded". That indicates that both penalties are enforced, which some how I managed to get hung up on. And yeah, I'm reading it the way you are now: any violation by the thrower following disconcertion by the opponent, no matter how unrelated the two may seem, results in a new free throw. "Shall."

But then, you still have to exercise judgment in determining whether it was disconcertion or not. And the word disconcert implies a direct cause and effect relationship. So maybe it really is not as black and white as it reads.

[Back In The Saddle]

Originally Posted by M&M Guy

That's awful binary of you.

Originally Posted by tjones1

When are we going to start talking about signed binary numbers!?

You know...

3-bit
-2 is 110

-or-

4-bit
-2 is 1110

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee

One's complemt or two's complement?

Man there are a lot of geeks here!

Note to Tony and the Mods: I didn't start this one

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee

One's complemt or two's complement?

Two's.