![]() |
Two violations
B1 disconcerts the free thrower. After the disconcertion, the free thrower continues the motion and releases the free throw, then steps into the lane early.
What happens next? |
One More Time ...
Quote:
|
Quote:
Would I still blow the whistle in the 2nd scenario? ;) |
Quote:
|
Read the penalties section after 9-1 carefully. . .
|
Quote:
|
NFHS 9-1 Penalties: 4. If there is a violation first by the free-thrower's opponent followed by the free thrower or a teammate:
c. If a violation by the free thrower follows disconcertion by an opponent, a substitute free throw shall be awarded. It sounds like you have a simultaneous violation because the shooter entered the lane early. Entering the lane early is not a situation you can reasonably "blame" on disconcertion. So blow that shot dead, regardless of whether it is made or missed, and award a replacement throw. 9.1.3.G seems to back this up. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Correct about that one, I stand corrected go to the table.:p |
Quote:
My statement was meant to convey that I don't believe this to be a situation where you ignore the second violation just because the first one happened. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle http://forum.officiating.com/images/...s/viewpost.gif Entering the lane early is not a situation you can reasonably "blame" on disconcertion. . </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE> Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41pm. |