case 9.1.1 part B - The Official Forum

#10 (permalink)

Sat Oct 11, 2008, 11:30am

Adam

Keeper of the HAMMER

Join Date: Jan 2003

Location: MST

Posts: 27,190

Quote:

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

Based on the cited rules, it seems the violation is based on the seeming inevitability of violating either the lane or the 10 count. Neither of which is a given. So does this only come into play when the fumble is such that one of those would HAVE to be violated?

Agreed, and it doesn't allow for the possibility of requesting a TO to keep the shot. A possibility specifically allowed for in the resumption of play.

__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
In case you haven't seen this...	IDref	Soccer	10	Sat Jul 21, 2007 02:30pm
Part 1 and Part 2 NFHS tests	WindyCityBlue	Baseball	28	Mon Nov 22, 2004 02:49pm
Case 6.3.2	rwest	Basketball	8	Thu Oct 28, 2004 04:04pm
Case Play, Part II	ejstuart	Soccer	6	Mon May 03, 2004 08:48pm
ASA case	oppool	Softball	6	Wed Feb 14, 2001 11:11pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08pm.