The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 02:52pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indianaref
Full court press. IW seems to be an advantage for the offensive team. How about enforce the TO?
How? Unless you heard and saw the HC request it, how can you force him to burn one?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 03:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
How? Unless you heard and saw the HC request it, how can you force him to burn one?
5.8.3 situation e
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 03:04pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indianaref
5.8.3 situation e
Doesn't this cover the case where team A has the ball, and team B's coach requests TO? In other words, the official grants a request where one shouldn't have been granted. I don't think this would cover the situation where there was no request.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 03:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lawton, OK
Posts: 505
Indiana,

don't have my books with me, but I still wouldn't grant a TO to team that should not be granted TO (team not in possession). This would give that team undue advantage to set up a play. IW and continue play
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 03:32pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravelinMan
Indiana,

don't have my books with me, but I still wouldn't grant a TO to team that should not be granted TO (team not in possession). This would give that team undue advantage to set up a play. IW and continue play
Really? At the NFHS level?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 03:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,083
Did some research. Here is the thread Timeout question!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 03:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravelinMan
Indiana,

don't have my books with me, but I still wouldn't grant a TO to team that should not be granted TO (team not in possession). This would give that team undue advantage to set up a play. IW and continue play
I think we are talking about when an official erroneously grants a time-out.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 03:57pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
I see some disagree with me. I'm not charging a coach with a TO that I granted him because some Dad in the stands asked for it. I screwed that up, not the coach.

Better yet, I'm slow to grant a coach's time out anyway; so I'll know it was him/her before I blow the whistle. (Knock on wood).
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 04:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indianaref
Did some research. Here is the thread Timeout question!
I forgot about this discussion.

I know this case play covers the situation I saw in a holiday tournament game one year. A1 shoots, misses, and B1 grabs the rebound and starts upcourt. A's coach is so upset her team didn't run the play properly, she starts yelling at the official standing front of her, "Gimme a time-out!!" Gimme a time-out NOW!!!" So, the poor official blows his whistle, and both the coach and official realize the "oops" about the same time. But, the request was granted, even though B wasn't allowed to have one in that situation, as per this case play.

Maybe BBallRef and JR will get on my case for this, but if I KNOW there is no request, I'm not granting a TO and going with the IW. If there is ANY possiblity that there was a word or signal that could've been a request, then the TO is granted. I don't ever want to get into that game where a coach or a team is purposely saying something confusing at the end of a game to possibly gain the advantage of the IW.

I don't know if it's both men and women, but I know the NCAA-W came out with the ruling that if a player is in the air and going OOB, and requests a TO to prevent a violation, and the official erroneously blows the whistle to grant the TO, the TO is not granted, the violation is administered, and it is treated as an IW. Granted, this is not the Fed., but it tells me there are a few isolated cases where the TO is not automatically granted just because the official blows the whistle to grant it.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 21, 2008, 04:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
I see some disagree with me. I'm not charging a coach with a TO that I granted him because some Dad in the stands asked for it. I screwed that up, not the coach.)
Oh no, I agree with Mr. Quixote...maybe I'll join him in his windmill tilting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
Better yet, I'm slow to grant a coach's time out anyway; so I'll know it was him/her before I blow the whistle. (Knock on wood).
That's the best way to avoid the issue - make sure the coach or player is requesting a legitimate TO. I would rather miss one or two requests that I couldn't verify in the heat of the moment, than to have to deal with a costly misunderstanding.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 22, 2008, 05:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mid-Hudson valley, New York
Posts: 751
Send a message via AIM to Lotto
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrapper1
Not necessarily. Suppose there is less than a minute remaining in the second half when A1 dunks the ball. The clock stops (in the NCAA) due to the successful try. But the force of the dunk causes it to bounce off another player toward midcourt.

Normally, if the ball bounces a long way away, we'll blow the whistle to stop the game and retrieve the ball. The clock is already stopped in this situation, though, so there's no reason for the whistle. So if the official (out of habit) blows the whistle, is it inadvertent? Do we let the subs in?

I think that the answer was that we do not let the subs in. I'm sure it's one of the NCAA bulletins for the year that the rule was introduced, but I don't have all the old bulletins.

With the women's rule, we don't even have to worry about this scenario.
Good point, although the situation still seems clear to me. The game is stopped neither to correct a timing mistake nor was this an inadvertent whistle, so bring the subs in in NCAAM. In NCAAW, they stay at the table.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 22, 2008, 06:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
I see some disagree with me. I'm not charging a coach with a TO that I granted him because some Dad in the stands asked for it. I screwed that up, not the coach.
How do you know it was a dad in the stands?
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 22, 2008, 07:11am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indianaref
How do you know it was a dad in the stands?
I don't, and I don't know it was the coach. If I don't "know" it was the coach, I'm not making him burn the TO.
It's just like blowing your whistle for a phantom OOB call and knowing immediately that you kicked it. Go with the IW and get the ball in play quickly (unless one of the coaches now wants to use a TO.)

The case play is clearly referring to team B (typically the team without the ball in the case book) requesting a TO and the whistle blowing for that. Here, you do not know who said it. Play on.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
understanding time outs newofficialtn Basketball 6 Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:48pm
understanding correctable errors roadking Basketball 10 Wed Jul 14, 2004 09:58pm
understanding basic concepts cloverdale Basketball 1 Thu Apr 01, 2004 02:44am
Understanding Force mikesears Football 25 Thu Jul 10, 2003 01:54am
Knowing and Understanding Rules PeteBooth Baseball 7 Mon Dec 23, 2002 11:17pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:12pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1