The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2008, 04:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to communicate! I love it when someone else grasps the rules discussion on an intellectual and philosophical level. Your last sentence lists what I believe to be a clear flaw in the rules.



The rules only prohibit a nonjumper from breaking the plane of the circle with a FOOT. The rule says nothing about other body parts. There is no protection other than a foul, but we have just discussed how calling one in this case is paradoxical.

BTW the rule for players in marked lane-spaces is the written the same way.
I realized after I posted this that the free throw violation is for the foot only. I guess I need to go review my rules as regards breaking the various planes.

Yeah, there does seem to be a blind spot in the rules in this fairly narrow case. I would be shocked if the NFHS ever said it was intentional. The rule about ignoring dead ball fouls unless they are intentional or flagrant seems squarely aimed at play that continues on following a live ball becoming dead, not before the ball becomes live. How often do we really see an example like the ones we're theorizing about?
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2008, 05:39pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
According to the rules you are incorrect. Too bad, JR.
Oh, boolsh!t. You're not only saying that I'm incorrect; you're saying that the rule is incorrect.That rules citation simply says that you CAN call a contact technical foul during a dead ball. But you don't like that rule so let's ignore it. That's exactly why I refused to get involved in this stoopid conversation with you. All you're doing is complicating a simple damn call with your goofy personal rules interpretation.

Just another typical 10,000 word treatise composed of nuthin' but complete doo-doo. You're the king of obfuscation and bafflegab.

Lah me....

Last edited by Jurassic Referee; Tue Apr 29, 2008 at 05:59pm.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2008, 06:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Just another typical 10,000 word treatise composed of nuthin' but complete doo-doo. You're the king of obfuscation and bafflegab.
Yeah, sure he is, but has anyone ever called him repuslive?
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2008, 07:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
That rules citation simply says that you CAN call a contact technical foul during a dead ball.
Nope, I'm saying that an official cannot do as you say and make such a call on a CONTACT play because the official deems the action unsporting. That was your advice and it is wrong. Under these circumstances (dead ball contact) a technical foul can only be called if the officials judges that the contact meets the NFHS definition of intentional or flagrant. There can be no other reason.

So name call all you want. You're still wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2008, 07:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Yeah, sure he is, but has anyone ever called him repuslive?
Is that really bad acne?
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2008, 07:46pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
You're still wrong.
And intellectually and philosophically, I still think that you're full of sh!t.

Continue the argument with yourself. You seem to be the only one around here that measures up to your lofty standards anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2008, 08:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Is that really bad acne?
Is that really the best you can do?
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2008, 08:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,015
Unfortunately, that seems to be the case as Padgett refuses to share his meds.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 29, 2008, 08:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Unfortunately, that seems to be the case as Padgett refuses to share his meds.
I'm guessing you're better off (but not less annoying) without Padgett's meds.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2008, 07:50am
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
How often do we really see an example like the ones we're theorizing about?
I would attempt to answer that but I'm not sure what play you and Nevada are theorizing. I lost track.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2008, 08:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef
I would attempt to answer that but I'm not sure what play you and Nevada are theorizing. I lost track.
It's the play where the kid with the repulsive acne gets smacked in the bafflegab, but during a dead ball.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2008, 08:54am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
Nope, I'm saying that an official cannot do as you say and make such a call on a CONTACT play because the official deems the action unsporting.
Let's look at that rule again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
4-19-14 . . . An unsporting foul is a noncontact technical foul which consists of unfair, unethical, dishonorable conduct or any behavior not in accordance with the spirit of fair play.
I think the part I highlighted in red leaves room to call an unsporting foul even when contact is involved. In fact, I think it specifically applies to a situation when, prior to the ball becoming live, a player grabs an opponent to prevent him from moving or to "get in his head."
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2008, 08:55am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
It's the play where the kid with the repulsive acne gets smacked in the bafflegab, but during a dead ball.
You mean he gave him the business? eeeeew!
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2008, 09:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: In a little pink house
Posts: 5,289
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaqwells
You mean he gave him the business? eeeeew!
No, you're thinking football.
__________________
"It is not enough to do your best; you must know what to do, and then do your best." - W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old Wed Apr 30, 2008, 09:08am
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
No, you're thinking football.
At least it wasn't diving or swimming.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jump Ball - Foul on Jumper - Mechanic question HawkeyeCubP Basketball 5 Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:27pm
Intentional foul on the jump ball RefLarry Basketball 16 Sun Oct 16, 2005 01:57pm
Intentional foul on jump ball? jritchie Basketball 6 Mon Dec 13, 2004 01:51pm
Jump Ball: Possession Arrow vs. Actual Jump Ball KingTripleJump Basketball 21 Thu Feb 12, 2004 08:47am
jump ball plenty of contact no foul Sideline Ref Basketball 6 Wed Jan 17, 2001 03:12pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:56am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1