Free Throw Violation- Shooter with ball

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

While I think that is probably how it's called in the very few cases where somebody tries to fake it, that's not actually what the rule says.

9-1-3b: "The free thrower shall not fake a try, nor shall any player in a marked lane space fake to cause an opponent to violate".

The "makes the opposing team violate" provision that you mention is applied only to players in the marked lane spaces. The part that relates to the shooter is pretty clear -- "shall not a fake a try".

I'm not sure it makes sense to parse the fed rule book this closely Scrappy, it's harldy an example of clarity in writing.

IMO the point of that passage is to define the consequences of faking by players during FTs. Clearly (well... maybe not so clearly...) the intent is as JR interprets it. Penalized if you're faking as the shooter OR player on a FT spot AND your fake causes your opponent to violate

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

I'm not sure it makes sense to parse the fed rule book this closely Scrappy, it's harldy an example of clarity in writing.

IMO the point of that passage is to define the consequences of faking by players during FTs.

You may very well be right, and I've already said that I think Jurassic's interpretation is how it's actually called in the real world. But as written, it seems to differ from that "real world" interp.

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

You may very well be right, and I've already said that I think Jurassic's interpretation is how it's actually called in the real world. But as written, it seems to differ from that "real world" interp.

C'mon... this is entirely too reasonable.

Maybe I'll go over to the boys vs girls thread for some excitement.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

I'm not sure it makes sense to parse the fed rule book this closely Scrappy, it's hardly an example of clarity in writing.

He's channeling his inner Nevada.

Or it's some kind of IAABO thingy.....