Delay to the nth degree

Originally Posted by rockyroad

Well you got at least one thing right. There is an idiot here, but it isn't me...the "world" wasn't against the Wrights. There were some people who said it would never work and that they were crazy to keep trying. You sound like you were there... "after their poor showing local newspapers virtually ignored them for the next year and a half. The Paris edition of the Herald Tribune headlined a 1906 article on the Wrights "FLYERS OR LIARS? James M. Cox, publisher at that time of the Dayton Daily News (later governor of Ohio and Democratic presidential nominee in 1920), expressed the attitude of newspapermen in those daysFrankly, none of us believed it."

But there were also people who supported the Wrights and encouraged them to keep at it...so there's one "doom-sayer" in this thread and a bunch of encouragers...you are without a doubt the complete idiot here, and posting your supposed resume really doesn't impress anyone. There are many here (including in this thread) who have done more State tournaments, State Championship games, and more higher level things than you have. So you disagreed with the way Padgett handled the situation, no one has a problem with that. But to just start blasting away and tell him he screwed up the game - well, like I said before, you deserve whatever you get. Moron.

I'd mention more but your head would explode. Ignored and dismissed, the world against them and for their French competitors - just like folks should treat a numbskull like you.

[swkansasref33]

Anybody watch Mind of Mencia? cuz Ralph's a "dee-dee-dee"

Originally Posted by swkansasref33

Anybody watch Mind of Mencia? cuz Ralph's a "dee-dee-dee"

So you would call NINE technicals in a youth REC game of 11-12 year olds? yeah - that'll teach em! Go back to hickville KS. Are you at the local "libary" on the local magic box?

[Rich]

Tick. Tock. Tick. Tock.

Originally Posted by RichMSN

Tick. Tock. Tick. Tock.

Don't worry. You showed the talent on this site - hammering a bunch of 11 yo for something that could have been prevented - and IS prevented every week by the simple proof no where in the USA are NINE T's called in a youth rec league. Case closed. Y'all can have your opinions and in this case it's wrong. Off to better things with more knowledable officials.

[swkansasref33]

anybody know if there is a way to kick members out of the forum? cuz this guys outta here

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by swkansasref33

anybody know if there is a way to kick members out of the forum? cuz this guys outta here

Comic relief only goes so far with these trolls. Don't let 'em get to you. That's their only raison d'etre for posting.

[rgncjn]

Originally Posted by Ralph

Oooh, unsporting behavior from 11-12 year old REC kids who don't have the talent to play competitive ball. Real eggregious.

Just because the events transpired in a REC league does not insinuate that competition ceases to exist. The REC league I work on Sunday afternoonos is known as one of the most competitive REC leagues in the state, (Grades 4 - 6). The teams in this league play better than most junior high school teams, at least in the area.

Get off your high horse. Take your ego down a few notches.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Ralph

- and IS prevented every week by the simple proof no where in the USA are NINE T's called in a youth rec league. Case closed. Y'all can have your opinions and in this case it's wrong.

I guess Ralph Malph doesn't know that Oregon in in the USA, since this is where it happened. Oh wait - they don't teach geography until the second grade. That explains it.

Not only that, he used "y'all". That explains everything.

Didn't he mention something about the French in another post? That proves he's FEEBLE-minded, too.

Oh yeah - "no where" is one word in that context. Oh wait - I keep forgetting they don't teach that stuff until the second grade.

To use his words, that's the "simple proof". Actually, it's simple to prove something when the person to whom you're referring is simple minded.

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Ralph

This site should be called lemming.com

You know, let's see, how much about lemmings??

http://www.snopes.com/disney/films/lemmings.asp

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemming

I'm guessing to the common but wrong belief that lemmings blindly follow each other off of cliffs and into lakes when their population increases too quickly. Note that this understanding of lemmings is completely incorrect. Perhaps your thinking is, too.

Also, I'm noticing that you've never given one iota of proof that you really are a referee. Why should we accept your point of view with any authority at all?

[JoeTheRef]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

All in all, they got nine, count 'em nine, delay warnings that resulted in eight technicals. Five warnings were for interfering with the ball after a made basket, four were for boundary violations.

9 Warnings, 8 technicals. 5 Warnings for interfering = 1 warning + 4 Technicals. 4 Warnings for boundary = 4 technicals for a total of 8 technicals? I'm either missing a warning, or you guys gave them an additional technical.

I think I'm wrong here and confused, and I don't have my books.. Daggumit, is it one warning per violation? No, it changed to one delay warning period... I CAN'T MAKE A RULING IF I DON'T KNOW THIS RULE!!!! HELP!

Furthermore, I do NCAA-W, NOW I'm really confused!!!!! Is it the same for FED?? Please help me, to much eggnog lastnight, and starbucks this morning!!

Is it one delay warning period for FED, and one warning for each type of delay for NCAA-W? I ask because that's how I would rule if I was in a game right this minute.

[Brad]

Ralph -- you have a little over 60 posts, yet Mark has over 6000... You might want to consider backing off with your personal attacks and poor attitude. Mark has not ever been suspended from this board in the many, many years he has participated, yet you are dangerously close...

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by JoeTheRef

9 Warnings, 8 technicals. 5 Warnings for interfering = 1 warning + 4 Technicals. 4 Warnings for boundary = 4 technicals for a total of 8 technicals? I'm either missing a warning, or you guys gave them an additional technical.

Is it one delay warning period for FED

Yup.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Brad

Ralph -- you have a little over 60 posts, yet Mark has over 6000... You might want to consider backing off with your personal attacks and poor attitude. Mark has not ever been suspended from this board in the many, many years he has participated, yet you are dangerously close...

Thank you for your support, Brad. I appreciate it. No joke here.

Originally Posted by rgncjn

Just because the events transpired in a REC league does not insinuate that competition ceases to exist. No I am actually stating that in a rec league, by definition, the talent level is far less and competencies are far less than in an equal aged competitive league. And as such, additional tolerences should be in play.
The REC league I work on Sunday afternoonos is known as one of the most competitive REC leagues in the state, (Grades 4 - 6). The teams in this league play better than most junior high school teams, at least in the area.

Get off your high horse. Take your ego down a few notches.

Since others care to pick on my typos..... "afternoonos"??? Must be a SW location.