|
|||
Quote:
The throw-in count ends when the ball is released, but the throw-in is not over until the ball is touched, therefore I don't see how 9-2-11 doesn't apply. |
|
|||
Quote:
May want to re-read that then.....A2 is not an opponent(s) |
|
|||
Quote:
No teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins. And, maybe you're confusing with 9-2-10 which deals with an opponent of the thrower being beyond the boundary-line plane... |
|
|||
Quote:
I asked myself if the clock would have ever started...If the answer is no then you have to go back to original inbound spot because you never had a legal throw-in. If the answer is yes then you felt that the throw in was "legal" and that the ball went OOB where A2 recieved it. My logic, however warped you think it may seem gave me only one conclusion, throw-in violation. I know that might seem like a different way to conclude the ruling, but I think it makes sense, doesn't it?
__________________
Do you really think it matters, Eddy? |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
Quote:
Example: A1 throws the ball towards A2 on a spot throwin. A2's first touch is an intentional kick (for whatever reason). The clock never starts here, but the violation puts the ball nearest A2's kick, not at the original spot.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
I agree and was only using it toward this situation....just stating that, in this case, the question can be answered with relative ease by just using common sense judgement...If that makes any sense.
__________________
Do you really think it matters, Eddy? |
|
|||
Quote:
This is the exact kind of question I messed with on the exam. Made my head hurt!! Better to just say true and move on! As discussed here it can be looked at in a number of ways..... |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Sorry for any confusion, I referred to the '06-'07 rules book. I guess I didn't realize they change the sections as much as they do each year. |
|
|||
Quote:
OK, let's modify the play a little bit to isolate the real question that is being asked in this thread: A1 steps OOB for a throw-in following a made goal by B. A1 passes the ball on the OOB side of the boundary plane to the corner of the court where A2 catches the ball while it is still on the OOB side of the boundary plane. A2 also has one foot inbounds and one foot touching the OOB line (but on the side line).This play removes the issue of the player being OOB during the throwin and makes it a question solely about whether catching the ball before it crosses the line takes precedence over catching the ball while the player has OOB status. A2's OOB location could just as well be the endline but then that would introduce the possibility of A1 trying to pass to A2 for a legal throwin but A2 didn't get all the way OOB....so I wanted to eliminate that from the equation:
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association Last edited by Camron Rust; Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 11:45am. |
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Throw in violation | lucky1313 | Basketball | 3 | Thu Mar 09, 2006 09:50am |
Throw-In Violation | Jurassic Referee | Basketball | 49 | Mon Dec 12, 2005 11:49am |
Throw in violation | Rita C | Basketball | 13 | Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:51am |
Throw-in violation? | illbball | Basketball | 3 | Mon Feb 07, 2005 07:18pm |
Throw In Violation?? | Rock'nRef | Basketball | 3 | Thu Nov 21, 2002 09:24am |