07-08 Test Question

[Scrapper1]

I think it's false because last year there was a rule change that said the uniform must be changed if there was any blood at all on it. The official is not allowed to exercise judgment on this, as we were in the past. It used to be that the uniform had to be changed if it was "saturated" with blood. Last year, that was changed.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

I think it's false because last year there was a rule change that said the uniform must be changed if there was any blood at all on it. The official is not allowed to exercise judgment on this, as we were in the past. It used to be that the uniform had to be changed if it was "saturated" with blood excessive. Last year, that was changed.

Nope, Scrapper, that is the wording that is used in the NCAA book. The NFHS rules used to say excessive.

But everything else that you stated is correct.

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Nope, Scrapper, that is the wording that is used in the NCAA book. The NFHS rules used to say excessive.

Well, in my own defense, if the shirt was saturated, I would say that it was also excessive.

I hate when I get stuff mixed up like that. Good catch.