NFHS Case Play 10.4.5 Situation E page 84

#9 (permalink)

Thu Oct 18, 2007, 10:40am

bob jenkins bob jenkins is offline

Official Forum Member

Join Date: Aug 1999

Posts: 18,193

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert E. Harrison

Why is one sub B6 allowed to fight with no penalty -- while sub A6 does not fight and gets the same punishment as if he had participated in the fight?

I agree that it seems strange. The penalties are more severe for leaving-and-fighting than for just leaving. It's just that "the math" works out so the total is equal in this one case, and it's been this way for many years.

What would you have different?

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is On Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FED Case Play 8.2.10 Situation A	rwest	Softball	2	Mon Aug 14, 2006 07:20am
Case 2.10.1 Situation C	JTRICE	Basketball	3	Mon Nov 21, 2005 08:04pm
NFHS Quarterly - Situation 9 on page 20	kentref	Football	3	Thu Aug 25, 2005 01:29pm
NF Case Play 8.2.2 Situation B	rdfox	Football	2	Sat Aug 07, 2004 09:26pm
NFHS 2002 Case book play 1.5.6	Mike Simonds	Football	11	Mon Mar 03, 2003 12:45pm

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23pm.