View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 18, 2007, 11:19pm
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
I guess I need to review this whole issue, but...

I thought when the dust settled you divided everybody into three categories:
  • Players who fight
  • Bench personnel who fight
  • Bench personnel who leave the bench, but do not fight.
And then the free throws only offset within each group. So I would have expected there to be free throws for both A6 and B6, since they were in different categories. I guess I am wrong?
No, you are not wrong. The three different categories need to be taken separately and the FTs tallied up. However, if any of the bench leaving happens at approximately the same time, then those Ts get classified as simultaneous fouls and thus the FTs would cancel. That is the case in the cited caseplay. However, if B6 and A6 had come off the bench clearly with one following the other, perhaps in response to observing the other run out there and hit someone, then both penalties are assessed in the order of occurrence.

It is easier and probably better to consider them simultaneous unless they were obviously not.
Reply With Quote