time out after made basket Question

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by todd pen

Well isnt that just indignant of you to say! Clearly I have read a rule book, and I did know, but at the time did not have my rule book sitting on the bench for easy reference. Also I asked as my rule book is an 05/06, rules change and I wanted to make sure by asking the question to current proffesionals.
I do appreciate the education, but do not appreciate the indignant comment, I have been curtious, maybe you should as well.

You think that I was angry? Perhaps you are in need of a dictionary. If you had written ignorant, your sentence would have at least made sense.

Anyway, you certainly weren't courteous (which you can't even spell ), rather your posts have been haughty and self-conceited. It is obvious that all that you were concerned with was being told that you were right and that the referee in your rec league game was wrong. Well, guess what? I don't care.
I posted merely to inform and state the rule for someone who might come along and read this thread, not to stroke your ego or say who was right and who was not.
Furthermore, you asked what criteria should be used to determine when a time-out should no longer be granted to the scoring team by an official. My post gave the exact two (disposal and the five-second count having begun), which I highlighted in red. Prior to my post only disposal had been mentioned, yet you arrogantly dismissed the extra information contained therein as having already been stated, when really you simply failed to grasp the clearer answering of your original question due to your being overjoyed that a previous poster had written that you were right. You even referred to that as your vindication. The truth is that after hearing that you became uninterested in learning anything more. That is too bad because judging by what you have written in this thread, your education could use some furthering.

For example:

Originally Posted by todd pen

What criteria should be used by a referee in determining wether or not to give a time out after a made basket?

There are two ways to spell that word depending upon the meaning required, yet you picked neither.

Originally Posted by todd pen

Then has the gaul to say ...

Gaul is an ancient country of Western Europe. Gall means brazen boldness or audacity.

[todd pen]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

You think that I was angry? Perhaps you are in need of a dictionary. If you had written ignorant, your sentence would have at least made sense.

Anyway, you certainly weren't courteous (which you can't even spell ), rather your posts have been haughty and self-conceited. It is obvious that all that you were concerned with was being told that you were right and that the referee in your rec league game was wrong. Well, guess what? I don't care.
I posted merely to inform and state the rule for someone who might come along and read this thread, not to stroke your ego or say who was right and who was not.
Furthermore, you asked what criteria should be used to determine when a time-out should no longer be granted to the scoring team by an official. My post gave the exact two (disposal and the five-second count having begun), which I highlighted in red. Prior to my post only disposal had been mentioned, yet you arrogantly dismissed the extra information contained therein as having already been stated, when really you simply failed to grasp the clearer answering of your original question due to your being overjoyed that a previous poster had written that you were right. You even referred to that as your vindication. The truth is that after hearing that you became uninterested in learning anything more. That is too bad because judging by what you have written in this thread, your education could use some furthering.

For example:

There are two ways to spell that word depending upon the meaning required, yet you picked neither.


Gaul is an ancient country of Western Europe. Gall means brazen boldness or audacity.

You are an idiot.
As far as my spelling, well I guess you have me there, but you fail to mention that I had neither become irreverent or rude until your follow-up post which referred to my knowledge.
I am ever so fortunate that you are not located anywhere near me as I can tell by your attitude in these posts that you must have many issues that are far from being resolved.
Consider therapy for these issues.
Upon further reading of all posts previous to your own, the answers were direct and friendly, whereas your own was disgusting and debasing.
I really feel for anyone who has the unfortunate task of having to be anywhere near you at any given time.
Please do this thread a huge favor and just stay away from it in the future. Clear to me is that what you think of yourself is something that few others appreciate.
In closing, my question was answered effectively by your superior peers, and there will be no further need for you to reply.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by todd pen

You are an idiot.

True dat.

But he is an idiot savant.

Iow don't mind Doofus. He's a legend in his own mind.

Y'all come back.

[Dan_ref]

Off-topic question..but what is there about internet forums that causes people to fly off the handle at the slightest provocation? People generally don't address each other in this rude, aggressive way in person...sigh. Can't we all just get along?

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

True dat.

But he is an idiot savant.

Iow don't mind Doofus. He's a legend in his own mind.

Y'all come back.

Why don't you just STFU you ignorant irrelevant old fool.

(btw I agree with you, which doesn't make me ignorant or irrelevant or old)

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

1) People generally don't address each other in this rude, aggressive way in person.

2) Why don't you just STFU you ignorant irrelevant old fool.

1) I generally do. Maybe we need a poll.......

2) You hurt my feelings. So......... I'm gonna kick Chuck the next time I see him.

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

2) You hurt my feelings. So......... I'm gonna kick Chuck the next time I see him.

Make sure it's a low kick

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

Make sure it's a low kick

A low kick will still hit him in the head.

[rockyroad]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

Make sure it's a low kick

Oh great, here we go with the short jokes again. One of these days I'm gonna have Chuck stand on my shoulders so we can punch you right in the gut!! And JR, too!

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Gaul is an ancient country of Western Europe.

"Gaulia omnia tres partes divisia est" (all Gaul is divided into three parts) - Julius Erving....er, I mean Caesar. Hey - do you think they're related?

Since most of this thread had nothing to do with the original question, I thought I'd contribute some more nonsense.

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by Mark Padgett

"Gaulia omnia tres partes divisia est" (all Gaul is divided into three parts) - Julius Erving....er, I mean Caesar. Hey - do you think they're related?

Since most of this thread had nothing to do with the original question, I thought I'd contribute some more nonsense.

Well, if we work hard enough we can make this the topic, can't we?

Old joke for you RC's out there...what's God's phone number?

Et cum Spirit two, two two oh

[just another ref]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

There are two ways to spell that word depending upon the meaning required, yet you picked neither.

Actually there are three: WETHER: a gelded male sheep