The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 18, 2007, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
What the NBA calls an "altercation" might not fit the wording of the rule or how the rule is *interpreted*.

Peace
"Might" not fit? "How the rule is interpreted."?

IOW, the rule isn't black and white as you said in your previous
posts. The rule, and the definition of "altercation", are subject
to interpretation. Right? You are flipping from it's "black and
white" to "how the rule is interpreted". Sounds like your point
of view is a shade of gray after all.

You need to make up your mind.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 18, 2007, 12:09pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColdShot
"Might" not fit? "How the rule is interpreted."?

IOW, the rule isn't black and white as you said in your previous
posts. The rule, and the definition of "altercation", are subject
to interpretation. Right? You are flipping from it's "black and
white" to "how the rule is interpreted". Sounds like your point
of view is a shade of gray after all.

You need to make up your mind.
Larry,

Can you quote the actual NBA Rule or policy (which it is more of a policy considering the NBA Officials do not decide on who is suspended and why)?

In the interviews that David Stern and Stu Jackson (NBA Basketball Operations?? and the guy that recommends all suspensions on conduct) they made it clear that the rule was black and white and that the Duncan situation did not fit the definition of an altercation. They also went on to say that the players in the "Duncan situation" did not even have words but ran up the court. All Dan Patrick could say was, "Should we make an exception because this will affect the entire series?" Now if that is all you got in a response, then that does not pass the test.

Look we are supposed to apply rules based on the way they are written and how the rules are interpreted. In this particular rule, the NBA wants to stop fighting and an escalation of fighting. Even in the Knicks-Nuggets fight in December, no one left the bench? A star player was involved in the fight? Why were those players smart enough not to leave the bench? I guess the Suns are not very smart.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
St. Patrick (N.J.) at Huntington, W.Va. (ESPN2, 7 p.m.) mick Basketball 5 Fri Feb 23, 2007 01:56am
Patrick DNTXUM P Softball 39 Fri Jan 19, 2007 07:55pm
NBA Refs miss 5% of calls - David Stern Jimgolf Basketball 25 Sat May 06, 2006 12:57pm
Skip Bayless on Patrick Sparks TubbyRules Basketball 22 Thu Apr 14, 2005 10:36am
NYTimes article on David Stern Dan_ref Basketball 0 Tue Apr 22, 2003 10:50am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1