Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JRutledge
This point of view is about as silly as saying we do not call an intentional foul based on the actual definition of what "intentional" means. We all know the term "intentional foul" has nothing to do with an intentional act.
Peace
|
Now who is being silly? This is comparing grapes and watermellons. Our rule states it does not have to be an intentional act to be an intentional foul. Since, as far as I know and please correct me if you have the information, the NBA does not have a written definition of altercation, Stern had a way out...just didn't take it.
Again, JMO...and you aren't going to change it.
