Signaling Delayed FT Violation

[jmaellis]

Originally Posted by HawkeyeCubP

Because, theoretically, you could still have a violation on the shooter for violating the 10-second rule, in which case you'd penalize both violations. (9-1-Penalties-4-b.)

Is it true that a lane violation committed by a player on the non-shooting team (9-1-9) isn't a violation until the ball leaves the thrower's hands? If so, if the thrower commits a 10 second violation (9-1-3) that violation causes the ball to become dead so there would not be a dual violation/penalty.

??

[HawkeyeCubP]

Originally Posted by jmaellis

Is it true that a lane violation committed by a player on the non-shooting team (9-1-9) isn't a violation until the ball leaves the thrower's hands? If so, if the thrower commits a 10 second violation (9-1-3) that violation causes the ball to become dead so there would not be a dual violation/penalty.

??

An opponent of the shooter violating a free-throw provision/requirement/rule is a violation as soon as it occurs, provided the ball is at the shooter's disposal. If the free throw is made, the violation is ignored. - Hence the delayed dead ball signal as soon as the violation occurs - not when the ball is released for the free throw (if the one precedes the other).

[Ignats75]

I would signal with my hand towards the backcourt. I would silently continue the count with my nearer hand. If the shooter violates, he gets a re-shoot due to the delayed violation.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by jmaellis

Is it true that a lane violation committed by a player on the non-shooting team (9-1-9) isn't a violation until the ball leaves the thrower's hands? If so, if the thrower commits a 10 second violation (9-1-3) that violation causes the ball to become dead so there would not be a dual violation/penalty.

??

No to both questions. It's a violation as soon as it happens, but the enforcement is delayed. THe play you describe in the second question is a double violation.