Disconcerting Thrower

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Also, those of us who have been through this discussion before know that a technical foul can be considered for the repeated disconcertion attempts.

Would I be correct in thinking that you'd call it an unsporting foul (10.3.7)? Or would it be delay (10.3.6)?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by mbyron

Would I be correct in thinking that you'd call it an unsporting foul (10.3.7)? Or would it be delay (10.3.6)?

http://forum.officiating.com/newrepl...reply&p=198071

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

From a POE on disconcertion in the 2001-02 rule book--"The committee emphasizes that disconcertion is a violation(9-1-5) and may result in a substitute throw. If persistent or deemed unsporting, the team/player may be penalized with a technical foul". They put "team" in there to deal with cases where the bench disconcerts.