Team control foul

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by mbyron

For Ohio, our state interpreter told us to disregard the new team-control signal, and to use only the player-control signal and point the direction the ball will go.

Yikes! That's very interesting. I can see where he's coming from, but seems like a little much. If I were a coach and knew the rules (ha, good one I know), he could cause you a lot of problems.

Does your interpreter also do the evaluations of those officials who are selected to go deep in the post season?

[mbyron]

Originally Posted by tjones1

Does your interpreter also do the evaluations of those officials who are selected to go deep in the post season?

I can't answer that question.

[stmaryrams]

Originally Posted by tjones1

Yikes! That's very interesting. I can see where he's coming from, but seems like a little much. If I were a coach and knew the rules (ha, good one I know), he could cause you a lot of problems.

Does your interpreter also do the evaluations of those officials who are selected to go deep in the post season?

Just went over this at our association meeting - also in Ohio I might add.

We are to show a foul (fist raised), Player control, and then point to a spot. Follow up by reporting the foul. They said they wanted this to clearly show there will be no free throws during a team control situation.

[IREFU2]

Originally Posted by mbyron

For Ohio, our state interpreter told us to disregard the new team-control signal, and to use only the player-control signal and point the direction the ball will go.

Oh My!!!!!

[Camron Rust]

I think the use of the PC signal is reasonable. Except for an airborne shot, the fouls are exactly the same in who it is on (a player on the team in control of the ball) and the penalty is the same (to the other team OOB nearest the foul). Don't know why they felt the need to create a new signal to indicate a foul that is only distinguished by which player has the ball.