![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
The question would only be true if the end line throw in wasn't after a made basket which would mean it would be a spot throw in or a sideline throw in since all of these are spot throw ins. Then if the ball was kicked it would be a spot throw in nearest to where the violation occurred. |
|
|||
I apologize for making this confusing.
I'd like to know if the NFHS answer key is wrong or if the case book is wrong. Q 75 specifically says the throw in is after a basket and B has end line privileges. On the throw in A intentionally kicks ball. When B throws in after this violation it will be a spot throw in. T or F The answer key says false. Therefore the throw in will be behind the end line and B will retain end line privileges. Case book 7-5.7 Situation B gives this exact scenario. In scenario (a) the kick is close to B on the end line and in (b) the kick is near the division line. Ruling according to the case book: (a) B gets throw in behind end line with privileges (b) B gets throw in at division line Spot throw in If the case book is correct then Q75 cannot be answered correctly. The Q does not indicate where the ball was kicked. Bad question or incorrect ruling in case book? |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Rule Number 1 for taking a True/False test. If the answer is not 100% Always True, it is false.
In this question, it could be a spot throw-in, if it was kicked near the division line, but if it remains on the endline the thrower still has the right to "run the endline". Since it is not 100% true, the answer must be false. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
NIump,
You're making this question way harder than it is. Just assume the violation happened on the end line -- where this scenario would most likely have happened. They retain the right to run the endline. Anywhere else they never had the right to begin with.
__________________
![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Generalizations are standard testing devices to see if you are paying attention and how thoroughly you know the material. The most common issue I've seen on these tests is what the penalty is and how is it administered.
If the question says "will" or "always" or "never" or any other generalization, be careful. Part of the answer might be correct some of the time, but not always, so double check the penalty portion for exceptions.
__________________
I couldn't afford a cool signature, so I just got this one. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
JMO, but you should quit worrying about the test question and instead study the case play so that you can apply the rule correctly should the scenario occur in one of your games.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nfhs Fg | Suudy | Football | 4 | Fri Oct 13, 2006 02:04pm |
NFHS #63 | MPLAHE | Basketball | 4 | Wed Nov 16, 2005 01:41am |
ASA vs. NFHS | bwbuddy | Softball | 4 | Tue Mar 08, 2005 03:09pm |
NEW - 2003 NFHS Football Rule Changes (as written by the NFHS Rules Committee) | KWH | Football | 27 | Tue Jan 21, 2003 11:30am |
NFHS on the Net | Paul LeBoutillier | Basketball | 3 | Thu Dec 28, 2000 12:01am |