shooting or not shooting

[tmuckel]

Team 1 taking ball out. They foul player defending them from team 2. Official calls offensive foul. should this be a shooting foul for team 2?

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by tmuckel

Team 1 taking ball out. They foul player defending them from team 2. Official calls offensive foul. should this be a shooting foul for team 2?

NFHS or NCAA rules?

Is the ball at the disposal of the player throwing the ball in when the foul occurred? Iow, has the 5-second throw-in count started?

Goota know this before you can get a correct answer.

[refnrev]

Originally Posted by tmuckel

Team 1 taking ball out. They foul player defending them from team 2. Official calls offensive foul. should this be a shooting foul for team 2?

_____________________________________

You need to give more information on this play. There are some variables depending upon what's happening. Give some more details.

[eyezen]

I am making an assumption here but I think the OP was an attempt at rephrasing this question:

While A-1 has the ball out of bounds for a throw-in, A-2 is charged with a personal foul against B-2. Team B is in the bonus. Official awards B-2 a one and one. Is the official correct?

My answer is yes (my rational is in NFHS there is no team control during a throw-in)

Note: That was one of this year's rule change proposals wasn't it? I wonder why it didn't make it.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by refnrev

_____________________________________

You need to give more information on this play. There are some variables depending upon what's happening. Give some more details.

Yeah, inquiring minds want to know!

[tmuckel]

eyezen, That is the exact thing that happen. But the official did not award the shot. He just gave the ball out to team b. Thanks. I was the scorer and just wondered what the correct call should of been. When I asked the official after the game he was not sure if he made the correct call and was going to look it up.

[eyezen]

Maybe the official was confused because that is a rule difference between NFHS and NCAA. In NCAA play the ball would of been awarded to team B OOB because in NCAA there is team control during a throw in, a subtle difference between the rulesets.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by eyezen

I am making an assumption here but I think the OP was an attempt at rephrasing this question:

While A-1 has the ball out of bounds for a throw-in, A-2 is charged with a personal foul against B-2. Team B is in the bonus. Official awards B-2 a one and one. Is the official correct?

My answer is yes (my rational is in NFHS there is no team control during a throw-in)

Note: That was one of this year's rule change proposals wasn't it? I wonder why it didn't make it.

Yes this is correct.

[26 Year Gap]

Originally Posted by eyezen

Maybe the official was confused because that is a rule difference between NFHS and NCAA. In NCAA play the ball would of been awarded to team B OOB because in NCAA there is team control during a throw in, a subtle difference between the rulesets.

Maybe break up the abbreviations a bit.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by eyezen

Maybe the official was confused because that is a rule difference between NFHS and NCAA. In NCAA play the ball would of been awarded to team B OOB because in NCAA there is team control during a throw in, a subtle difference between the rulesets.

As opposed to awarding the ball to Team Flatchest.

[IREFU2]

Originally Posted by tmuckel

Team 1 taking ball out. They foul player defending them from team 2. Official calls offensive foul. should this be a shooting foul for team 2?

No team control on a throw in. Need more information.