Need Help on this screw up

[tjones1]

Which is spot nearest to the intentional foul.

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by Snaqwells

In my game, I'm going AP.

Whoa, there, Buckaroo!! You can't just sneak in a six-word response in the middle of a thread when no one's seen or heard from you in months!! How the heck are you any way??

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by tjones1

Which is spot nearest to the intentional foul.

Nope.

The POI is the first of the 2 FT's for the intentional foul. The throw-in by team A at the spot closest to the intentional foul is part of the penalty for the intentional foul. NFHS rule 4-36-2(b). - "Play shall be resumed by.....a free throw....when the stoppage occurred during this activity or if a team is entitled to such". Team A was entitled to A1's 2 FT's, so the POI is the first of those 2 FT's..

[jritchie]

I would have to go with No throws on double T, give team A the two merited free throws from the intentional and give team A ball on the end line, if that is closest spot to where intentional foul occurred!

[bigdogrunnin]

I would agree with JR. POI is when A1 receives the ball for the 1st of the 2 free throws.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Nope.

The POI is the first of the 2 FT's for the intentional foul. The throw-in by team A at the spot closest to the intentional foul is part of the penalty for the intentional foul. NFHS rule 4-36-2(b). - "Play shall be resumed by.....a free throw....when the stoppage occurred during this activity or if a team is entitled to such". Team A was entitled to A1's 2 FT's, so the POI is the first of those 2 FT's..

Ahhhh yes, wasn't thinking clearly. Thanks for the correction JR.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Nope.

The POI is the first of the 2 FT's for the intentional foul. The throw-in by team A at the spot closest to the intentional foul is part of the penalty for the intentional foul. NFHS rule 4-36-2(b). - "Play shall be resumed by.....a free throw....when the stoppage occurred during this activity or if a team is entitled to such". Team A was entitled to A1's 2 FT's, so the POI is the first of those 2 FT's..

So A1's free throws are no longer shot with the lane cleared?

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

So A1's free throws are no longer shot with the lane cleared?

No, I believe they are. I just misapplied what the POI was, the player will attempt their throws with no one in the lane. Then the throw-in will be spot nearest to the intentional foul. Re-read JR's post, he states it pretty good.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by tjones1

No, I believe they are. I just misapplied what the POI was, the player will attempt their throws with no one in the lane. Then the throw-in will be spot nearest to the intentional foul. Re-read JR's post, he states it pretty good.

Oh, now I see what JR's point was. Someone stated that POI was the throw-in, when actually the POI is the 1st of 2 free throws, which would then be followed by Team A's throw-in.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Oh, now I see what JR's point was. Someone stated that POI was the throw-in, when actually the POI is the 1st of 2 free throws, which would then be followed by Team A's throw-in.

Yup, and that's exactly why I asked the question yesterday...... if B1's foul wasn't intentional but was still on A1 while he was shooting, what would you do? In that case, the POI after the double "T" that followed would still be the first of 2 free throws, but you would line the players up on the lanes in that case.

[tjones1]

Originally Posted by BadNewsRef

Someone stated that POI was the throw-in...

I'll take claim to that dumbas$ attack!