Case play 7.1.1 is not correct

[Jimgolf]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

So you don't have a rule / case play / interpretation that backs it up? That's what I thought.

Umm, I think I quoted the definition of an interrupted dribble, and showed that it's possible that this play doesn't meet this definition.

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

If in the opinion of the official the player continuously maintained player control, then this is a dribble and a violation.

That's all I was saying. There is more to this than meets the eye and the official has to use best judgment. I was not saying the case book play was incorrect, just that is was not as clearcut as almost everyone other than JTRICE was making it to be.