|
|||
Bilas on the shot clock/10 second call
Bilas made the comment last night during Duke/LSU that it's easy to tell whether there has been a 10 second violation by looking at the shot clock.
A couple of thoughts on that. First, I wonder whether NCAA refs actually use the shot clock for this purpose. If the trailing official has not actually seen the clock reset on change of possesion, does he just defer to the clock operator and assume that it started exactly at the point of possession? And if so, why does he count it off -- why not just let the shot clock do the work. Tradition? Second, and more important, what Bilas said was something like, "when the clock gets to 25 it's clear that it's a 10 second violation." Actually, isn't that wrong? I assume the shot clock works like the game clock, so that when it scrolls from 26 to 25, really only 9 seconds have elapsed. It's not until the instant that it changes from 25 to 24 that 10 seconds have elapsed. Anyway, sort of a pin-headed question, but I thought it was an interesting comment. |
|
|||
The start of your count and the start of the shot clock are not necessarily the same. Bilas is wrong like a lot of commentators. There has to be some possession by Team A to start the 10 second count. The shot clock starts no matter who actually touches the ball.
Peace |
|
|||
Quote:
Good catch by Burr. |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Well, let me ask the question a slightly different way.
On the play in question, I believe the ball was inbounded and caught cleanly. In that circumstance, does the official defer to the shot clock operator to have started the clock properly, or does he simply count it off himself without any regard to the shot clock. Seems like that situation can put a ref in a pretty tough position. If the clock reads 25 when the whistle is blown, you should expect a pretty harsh comment from the coach, since, if the clock operator pushed the button at the right time, it cannot possibly be 10 seconds. Conversely, if the player doesn't cross until after it reads 24, the other coach seems to have a gripe. |
|
|||
This is why your count should be the only count. If you look in the rulebook (which we are supposed to use) and mechanics books, you still give a visual count in these situations. I do not care what the coach says, my count is what matters and that is what I would tell them. I cannot speak for this level of basketball and the people that work them. I can tell you from my lower level college experience we have people that start the clock improperly all the time. So if I go by the shot clock alone, I might find myself in a lot of trouble.
Peace |
|
|||
Quote:
Since I can say with absolute confidence that I will never officiate in a league that uses shot clocks, it was mostly a point of curiosity. |
|
|||
I do JuCo ball, and as you can imagine the shot clock operators are not NBA caliber, so in my particular case I don't use the shot clock. I have many a game where the shot clock operator starts the clock too early (when the ball is still at the disposal of the thrower-in after a made basket) and sometimes really late (which in a lot of cases we have to kill play and have time ticked off the shot clock--using our 10-second count as definite knowledge)
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR Last edited by Raymond; Fri Mar 24, 2006 at 08:18pm. |
|
|||
If I have a good shot clock operator and if the ball is controlled as soon as it comes inbounds,then yes, I will use the shot clock for my 10 second count.
Also, if you have a good shot clock operator and if the ball is controlled as soon as it comes inbounds, and if my partner loses the count for some reason, then yes, I will call it from the C when the shot clock gets to 25.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only! |
|
|||
Quote:
35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 10 seconds has expired when the clock hits 25. 35 - 10 = 25 I hope that clears it up for you.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott "You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith |
|
|||
Quote:
Actually, by that logic, 35 seconds would have expired when the clock hits 1, and we know that's not true. So I am confused. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 sec. shot clock | Bart Tyson | Basketball | 1 | Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:42pm |
shot clock or not to shot clock | Pat McCarthy | Basketball | 5 | Wed Nov 05, 2003 04:46pm |
shot clock | jjaw2 | Basketball | 13 | Thu Jan 30, 2003 12:54am |
Shot Clock Problem, Without the Shot Clock!! | rainmaker | Basketball | 6 | Wed Jun 05, 2002 10:09am |
Shot Clock | ilya | Basketball | 4 | Fri Nov 03, 2000 02:26pm |