View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 24, 2006, 12:24pm
JRutledge JRutledge is offline
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by All_Heart
But in this case the possession started the same time as the shot clock. I thought Bilas was wrong because he said it's a violation when it's at 25 seconds. I was thinking that it had to read 24 seconds in order to know that 10 seconds took place.

Good catch by Burr.
I am not debating the situation that took place in the actual game you saw. I am just addressing that what Bilas is saying is basically wrong. Simply touching the ball does not start the count; you have to have possession first. So the time coming off the clock will be misleading if you use that as your only reference point.

Peace
Reply With Quote