I have a good test question..see if you can get this one

[Kajun Ref N Texas]

Originally posted by caliref
I'm guessing that the DOG violation ended the AP throw-in try and it then became a violation throw in try... so maybe thats why he didn't want to change the arrow.

OK, to take this to its natural progression. If the DOG is the second and becomes a T, then the following throw-in would be at the division line for the T and not the completion of the original throw-in, so maybe you do not change the AP after the first DOG.

OK, I'll concede, that was a better question than I originally thought.