Quote:
Originally posted by caliref
I'm guessing that the DOG violation ended the AP throw-in try and it then became a violation throw in try... so maybe thats why he didn't want to change the arrow.
|
OK, to take this to its natural progression. If the DOG is the second and becomes a T, then the following throw-in would be at the division line for the T and not the completion of the original throw-in, so maybe you do not change the AP after the first DOG.
OK, I'll concede, that was a better question than I originally thought.