|
One wishes one could ask . . .
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
I disagree completely. It's not a "T" until the player actually comes on the court. And then, it's a player "T", not a team "T". See case book play 10.3.3SitB- "RULING: A technical foul is charged to A5 for returning during playing action even though A5 had not been replaced.
|
JR -- That play deals with a substition error (A5 left in the mistaken belief that a sub had replaced A5).
The play in this thread deals with a TO. It *might* be a different situation.
iirc (I don't have the books handy), there's a play where B is not ready to play after the TO. The officials use the resumption-of-play procedure and give A the ball. Then, 4 B players return to the court. The 5th either stays on the bench or comes in later (I forget). In this situation, it's an immediate T -- once the team returns, all must return at approximately the same time.
One could ask whether the NFHS intends for the two situations to be treated differently. 
|
but one guesses they just aren't being paid enough to make themselves readily, sensibly available. Yuh think it has to do with 'no competition'?
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
|
Fri Dec 16, 2005, 12:29am
Threaded Mode
