Delay Warnings

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Rule 9-4.3



The opponents of the thrower-in shall not have any part of their person beyond the vertical inside plane of any boundary line before the ball has crossed that boundary line. Repeated infractions shall result in a Class B technical foul.



Am I missing something?

But that restriction is not part of the warnings. Maybe it's an oversight by those who write the rules. Wouldn't be the first time.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by SC Official

Rule 9-4.3

The opponents of the thrower-in shall not have any part of their person beyond the vertical inside plane of any boundary line before the ball has crossed that boundary line. Repeated infractions shall result in a Class B technical foul.

Am I missing something?

Originally Posted by Raymond

But that restriction is not part of the warnings. Maybe it's an oversight by those who write the rules. Wouldn't be the first time.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

I think it is an oversight. The fact that a repeated infraction leads to a technical suggests that their must be some recording of the first infraction. Otherwise, how do you document the repeated element of it? If it isn't recorded, how can you get to the T, by rule?

[bob jenkins]

But I do not think "repeated" means "a second time" as in the other delay warnings.

That's JMO -- I don't work NCAAM ball.

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I think it is an oversight. The fact that a repeated infraction leads to a technical suggests that their must be some recording of the first infraction. Otherwise, how do you document the repeated element of it? If it isn't recorded, how can you get to the T, by rule?

With flopping added as one of the player delays, If it is an oversight they need to send out a correction

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by Raymond

But that restriction is not part of the warnings. Maybe it's an oversight by those who write the rules. Wouldn't be the first time.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

I went all the way back to 2017-18, and you're right. Thought maybe it was an oversight last year when they revised the delays. I never realized that the defender crossing the throw-in plane is not one of the player delay warnings.

"Failing to provide sufficient space along the out of bounds line for a
throw-in after being warned by an official per Rule 7-6.8.e" is one of the player delays, but that has nothing to do with the throw-in plane rule.

I do think the way the current rule as written leaves something to be desired, but at least my original question has been answered.

[BillyMac]

NFHS RULE 4 SECTION 47 WARNING FOR DELAY
A warning to a team for delay is an administrative procedure by an official which is recorded in the scorebook by the scorer and reported to the head coach:
ART. 1 For throw-in plane violations, as in 9-2-10, 10-2-1c.
ART. 2 For huddle by either team and contact with the free thrower, as in 10-2-1d.
ART. 3 For interfering with the ball following a goal as in 10-2-1e.
ART. 4 For failure to have the court ready for play following any timeout as in 10-2-1f.