UCF/Duke

[griblets]

Originally Posted by cmb

Also disappointed (but not surprised) that Steratore did not raise this point. He acted as if the judgment call of whether it the rim was a reviewable play.

He said they were checking to see if it was a shot clock operator error for resetting the shot clock incorrectly.

[cmb]

Originally Posted by griblets

He said they were checking to see if it was a shot clock operator error for resetting the shot clock incorrectly.

That rule you are referring to is used in an instance where the shot clock was reset and the officials feel it definitively should not have been. If they felt the initial shot didn’t hit the rim, then it was an obvious shot clock violation on review because black #15 got the rebound and had both hands on the ball and hadn’t left the ground for the putback yet when it hit 0. Still puzzled.

[thedewed]

Definite push in the back late on the Zion missed FT. 2 hands in the back, Dawkins goes flying to the other side of the rim, and immediately complains to the officials. A big miss.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by thedewed

Definite push in the back late on the Zion missed FT. 2 hands in the back, Dawkins goes flying to the other side of the rim, and immediately complains to the officials. A big miss.

Play #4:



Peace

[dahoopref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Play #4:



Peace

I've seen less contact called an F1 Hook & Hold than what Duke #12 did on UCF #35; that was unfortunately a miss.

UCF #15 does a really bad job on boxing out. The ball bounces outward from the rim. The C and L would have a closed look on any obvious contact by Duke #5.

[MechanicGuy]

Originally Posted by dahoopref

I've seen less contact called an F1 Hook & Hold than what Duke #12 did on UCF #35; that was unfortunately a miss.

UCF #15 does a really bad job on boxing out. The ball bounces outward from the rim. The C and L would have a closed look on any obvious contact by Duke #5.

I thought that hook would have warranted a second look had anyone noticed it live. But it's very congested and the ball went the other direction, so I don't blame them for not seeing it live.

Play 1: 50/50 foul but defender jumps first and compromises position. Need faster whistle though.

Play 2: Absolutely not a PC on Zion. CC on grounded RA play on Tacko.

Play 3: CNC. Interesting to note that if Tacko deflects the inbound pass the rule changes and there would no longer be a back court exception. Important for the Trail to pay attention to whether the ball was deflected and also for the Lead to have awareness to call this play if Trail does not.

Play 4: Marginal push in the back on Slot side rebounding, given the time/score in that situation. Could see a hook and hold foul on the Lead side rebounder.

[jakeas2]

It's interesting to me in play #2 that the C actually calls the foul on Tacko and not the Lead. It's the right call but makes me think that the foul was not for being grounded in the restricted area.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by jakeas2

It's interesting to me in play #2 that the C actually calls the foul on Tacko and not the Lead. It's the right call but makes me think that the foul was not for being grounded in the restricted area.

He pointed at the restricted area.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

[jakeas2]

Originally Posted by Rich

He pointed at the restricted area.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Good call. I missed that in the video.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SC Official

7:38 second half. Foul or good block?

Play #1:

Originally Posted by Fuelrider

NO PC on Zion on the drive with 17 seconds left before the Taco foul? Thoughts?

Play #2:



Peace

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Play #1:



...

Peace

Let shot blockers block shots. Leads, leave plays alone that are on the other side of the basket.

In my pregames.



Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk