UCF/Duke

[thedewed]

Definite push in the back late on the Zion missed FT. 2 hands in the back, Dawkins goes flying to the other side of the rim, and immediately complains to the officials. A big miss.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by thedewed

Definite push in the back late on the Zion missed FT. 2 hands in the back, Dawkins goes flying to the other side of the rim, and immediately complains to the officials. A big miss.

Play #4:



Peace

[dahoopref]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Play #4:



Peace

I've seen less contact called an F1 Hook & Hold than what Duke #12 did on UCF #35; that was unfortunately a miss.

UCF #15 does a really bad job on boxing out. The ball bounces outward from the rim. The C and L would have a closed look on any obvious contact by Duke #5.

[MechanicGuy]

Originally Posted by dahoopref

I've seen less contact called an F1 Hook & Hold than what Duke #12 did on UCF #35; that was unfortunately a miss.

UCF #15 does a really bad job on boxing out. The ball bounces outward from the rim. The C and L would have a closed look on any obvious contact by Duke #5.

I thought that hook would have warranted a second look had anyone noticed it live. But it's very congested and the ball went the other direction, so I don't blame them for not seeing it live.

Play 1: 50/50 foul but defender jumps first and compromises position. Need faster whistle though.

Play 2: Absolutely not a PC on Zion. CC on grounded RA play on Tacko.

Play 3: CNC. Interesting to note that if Tacko deflects the inbound pass the rule changes and there would no longer be a back court exception. Important for the Trail to pay attention to whether the ball was deflected and also for the Lead to have awareness to call this play if Trail does not.

Play 4: Marginal push in the back on Slot side rebounding, given the time/score in that situation. Could see a hook and hold foul on the Lead side rebounder.

[Pantherdreams]

1. This is a tough call if you think he was going to finish with his outside hand anyway then contact is marginal let shot blockers be shot blockers. If you fee like he was going up with 2 or lost the ability to finish with his inside hand because a 260+ pound man is on and through his inside arm then I'm ok with it going to the line. Felt late to go with the foul but I'm ok either way.

2. This looks too much like the one he got called for earlier to not get the PC on the first contact. For consistency no call both or get both Official got the rule right with RA and grounded on Tacko.

3. Looks odd but we are all good.

4. It certainly doesn't look like he pushes him hard, but why on the most important rebound of your life would the player jump under the rim and basket to board the ball. Feel like their was displacement there based on what I'm seeing.

[johnny d]

Play 4 is an obvious hook and hold on white 12. Should have been an F1.

[jakeas2]

It's interesting to me in play #2 that the C actually calls the foul on Tacko and not the Lead. It's the right call but makes me think that the foul was not for being grounded in the restricted area.

[Rich]

Originally Posted by jakeas2

It's interesting to me in play #2 that the C actually calls the foul on Tacko and not the Lead. It's the right call but makes me think that the foul was not for being grounded in the restricted area.

He pointed at the restricted area.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

[jakeas2]

Originally Posted by Rich

He pointed at the restricted area.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Good call. I missed that in the video.