UCF/Duke

[SC Official]

At 11:02 in the second half is a great example of the backcourt exception on throw-ins. Officiated correctly and a straightforward play if you know the rules, but something plenty of people would grumble about.

There are probably other plays as well but I haven't watched much.

[SC Official]

7:38 second half. Foul or good block?

[JRutledge]

Wow that review for the shot clock is almost impossible.

Peace

[SC Official]

I did not realize you were allowed to review whether the ball hit the rim or not. I knew you could review whether the shooter got it off in time.

[SC Official]

14 seconds left, foul on Fall. What did he do wrong?

Full disclosure, I am a Duke hater.

[cmb]

Originally Posted by SC Official

I did not realize you were allowed to review whether the ball hit the rim or not. I knew you could review whether the shooter got it off in time.

You’re not, which is why I’m confused and trying to figure out what, exactly, they were reviewing. Also disappointed (but not surprised) that Steratore did not raise this point. He acted as if the judgment call of whether it the rim was a reviewable play.

[griblets]

UCF alum in need of unbiased opinion!

On the play where Fall fouls out, did Taylor draw a PC that should have been called? Then, was Fall vertical?

On the rebound and put back of the missed free throw that put Duke up by 1, did the rebounder displace Dawkins, who went flying thru the lane abnormally?

Appreciate the non-biased review.

[cmb]

Originally Posted by SC Official

14 seconds left, foul on Fall. What did he do wrong?

Full disclosure, I am a Duke hater.

He was grounded in the restricted area when the contact with Zion occurred. This is an automatic blocking foul. He needs to either jump or get out of the RA.

[SC Official]

Originally Posted by cmb

He was grounded in the restricted area when the contact with Zion occurred. This is an automatic blocking foul. He needs to either jump or get out of the RA.

I thought he jumped. Oh well.

[Fuelrider]

NO PC on Zion on the drive with 17 seconds left before the Taco foul? Thoughts?

[Fuelrider]

Originally Posted by cmb

You’re not, which is why I’m confused and trying to figure out what, exactly, they were reviewing. Also disappointed (but not surprised) that Steratore did not raise this point. He acted as if the judgment call of whether it the rim was a reviewable play.

REALLY not allowed to review if shot hit the rim?

[Krr25]

Seems like a lot of No PC calls on Zion

[griblets]

Originally Posted by cmb

Also disappointed (but not surprised) that Steratore did not raise this point. He acted as if the judgment call of whether it the rim was a reviewable play.

He said they were checking to see if it was a shot clock operator error for resetting the shot clock incorrectly.

[MechanicGuy]

Originally Posted by SC Official

7:38 second half. Foul or good block?

Foul.

But the officials turned it into a 1-and-1 during the break somehow. Missed the front end and play went on

That's the kind of mistake that will likely cost them S16 assignments.

[cmb]

Originally Posted by griblets

He said they were checking to see if it was a shot clock operator error for resetting the shot clock incorrectly.

That rule you are referring to is used in an instance where the shot clock was reset and the officials feel it definitively should not have been. If they felt the initial shot didn’t hit the rim, then it was an obvious shot clock violation on review because black #15 got the rebound and had both hands on the ball and hadn’t left the ground for the putback yet when it hit 0. Still puzzled.