Another throw in sit

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

That was FED's i(incorrect) interp about 15 years ago. Thankfully, they corrected it within a year or two after issuing it.

Originally Posted by BillyMac

An ancient interpretation that this was a throwin violation because the inbounder did not pass the ball directly to a player on the court. This interpretation is now as dead as an Egyptian mummy. No need to call Lara Croft.

Actually, the current Rule is the Ancient Rule. The "Ancient Rule" to which Billy refers was the Rule between the Rule as it is now which was also the Ancient Rule before the "Ancient Rule".

MTD, Sr.