Quiz Time ...

[deecee]

I don't see mention of a throw in violation

3) Inbounder A-1 has a designated spot throwin. Before releasing the inbound pass A-1 moves several feet to his left, outside the three foot wide designated spot. Official rules that A-1 has committed a traveling violation, signals the traveling violation, and awards Team B a designated spot throwin at the original throwin spot. Is the official correct? No. (7-6-3)

nor do I see how this is confusing

"Ref calls an intentional foul and correctly clears the lane (yes) but incorrectly requires players to be behind the division line (no)."

Either the whole statement is true or not. In this case it's not. If a test taker gets it wrong is most likely because most officials ALSO get this wrong in application.

[LRZ]

Avoid unnecessary ambiguities.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by LRZ

... the call may be correct but the reason and/or penalty incorrect ...

Originally Posted by sdoebler

... double takes ...

Originally Posted by deecee

For any yes/no question the whole statement must be true for a YES otherwise it's a NO.

Originally Posted by deecee

... nor do I see how this is confusing ... Either the whole statement is true or not ... If a test taker gets it wrong is most likely because most officials ALSO get this wrong in application.

Most IAABO tests are like this, read the entire situation, was the official entirely correct, or was he incorrect in some manner.

Confusing is a strong word. IAABO refresher exams (this is most likely to be used as such) are supposed to be very challenging, not confusing.

Read the entire situation, did the official do everything correct, or did he so something incorrect?

Thanks to those who responded. I'll give it a few more days and then submit it to my IAABO Connecticut state interpreter.