[sdoebler]

Originally Posted by LRZ

Unless I'm mistaken, a distinct possibility, several answers are not clear because the yes/no option does not focus on exactly what is at issue--the call, reason/rule, or penalty. That is, the call may be correct (yes) but the reason and/or penalty incorrect (no):

For example, 7-3. The ref correctly calls the throw-in violation (yes), but incorrectly calls it a travel (no) and awards a TI at the original spot (yes).

8-4: Ref calls an intentional foul and correctly clears the lane (yes) but incorrectly requires players to be behind the division line (no).

No? What am I missing?

This was my feeling also with some double takes. In these to cases I think that the wording would be: Did the official rule correctly? Yes. Did the official administer/signal correctly? No