Patient Whistle?

[bucky]

Originally Posted by ChuckS

I clearly see B2 push A2

To me, that says it all. I think everyone will agree that if they "clearly see B2 push A2" then they will call the foul.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by bucky

To me, that says it all. I think everyone will agree that if they "clearly see B2 push A2" then they will call the foul.

Not at all.

The statement is necessary, but not sufficient.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

Not at all.

The statement is necessary, but not sufficient.

I know, thus my tagline.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by bucky

I know, thus my tagline.

I am confused. "B2 pushes A2" is not a rule -- so it can't be enforced or ignored, so I'm not sure what it has to do with your tagline.

[bucky]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

I am confused. "B2 pushes A2" is not a rule -- so it can't be enforced or ignored, so I'm not sure what it has to do with your tagline.

Respectfully, therein lies the disagreement. I find the act of a push or pushing in many places within the rule book.

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by bucky

Respectfully, therein lies the disagreement. I find the act of a push or pushing in many places within the rule book.

It's not one of the "automatics" so it's only a foul when it creates an advantage (or causes a disadvantage)

[bucky]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

It's not one of the "automatics" so it's only a foul when it creates an advantage (or causes a disadvantage)

(now we are off topic but...)

Point me in the direction of the rule book where advantage/dis is in regards to fouls again? I forgot where that was and an immediate electronic search returned nothing.