![]() |
|
|||
#7:
#8: #9: #10: #11: Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Play 7...good call.
Play 8...good call, defender was not vertical. Play 9...great call. Screener didn't allow time/distance. The screen was blind and the opponent was moving. As for the coverage, that was the closest matchup to the L (no offensive players were even inside the 3-point arc). There was nothing else he could or should have been watching and he had the best view of that play. Both the C and the T were straightlined on that. Play 10...good call. Even had 2-hands on the shooter briefly before the block. Play 11. Contact, yes. But it was after the shot was away...the ball was about 2 feet out of the shooters hand at the time of the contact. That contact had no effect on the play and was incidental.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
#7: One of those "fool the refs" play. A2 has his arm on top of B2's shoulder and then flings his arm back to make it appear he was bumped. Call doesn't hurt though as it lets the players know they are being watched off-ball.
#8: Lead has no reason for a double whistle, Center had the play all the way and had already put a whistle on it. #9: Yes, the Lead should have this call. Trail has on-ball coverage and can't see the legality of screen. It is set by a player coming from outside his primary, so he needs help. #10: Correct call. A1 did nothing wrong; B1 initiates the contact and then flops, causing A1 to be knocked off-balance. #11: I would leave this to the Lead. Trail is behind the play, while the Lead has a perfect view between A1 and B1.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Because Lead is n̶o̶t̶ ̶a̶ ̶v̶e̶r̶y̶ ̶g̶o̶o̶d̶ ̶b̶a̶s̶k̶e̶t̶b̶a̶l̶l̶ ̶r̶e̶f̶e̶r̶e̶e̶ ball watching and not trusting his partner.
Last edited by AremRed; Fri Dec 01, 2017 at 10:11am. Reason: Edited to sound more PC for Rich and Ray |
|
|||
This is a D1 high profile game, so I have to think lead is a very good basketball referee. So I'm curious if this is something college officials would typically do or if this was just poor positioning and he was late moving over but intended to and was refereeing the play as if he had from where he was. I'm not a college official, so I am curious what others would say - Raymond's response clears it up for me.
|
|
|||
There are high profile officials whom I am not particularly fond of, but I would never say they are not good officials (eye of the beholder), and would not bash them in a public forum, especially an officiating forum.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
And let’s be honest — he ain’t there for his play calling ability. He’s there because, despite being a mediocre playcaller, he’s an excellent communicator and coaches love him. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
JRut - you quoted an AremRed statement but used my name for the quote (in poet #28) - just wanted to make that clear that I did not make that statement in the response you were quoting.
|
|
|||
You are right, I looked one below.
I deleted the comments above as I clearly had the wrong play. I even went back and looked at the play again and was only thinking of that play. My mistake on that one and modified my statement. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) Last edited by JRutledge; Fri Dec 01, 2017 at 10:44am. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Big Ten/ACC challenge | Nevadaref | Basketball | 6 | Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24am |
A Challenge! | JugglingReferee | Football | 16 | Sat Aug 23, 2008 06:25pm |
A-10/ACC challenge | ChuckElias | Basketball | 0 | Wed Dec 07, 2005 09:57pm |
Big 10/ACC challenge | ChuckElias | Basketball | 51 | Mon Dec 05, 2005 12:39pm |
New challenge! | DJ | Basketball | 0 | Wed Feb 11, 2004 02:15pm |