The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 01:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Excellent rules point stated by Camron and backed by BNR.
  #32 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 02:12pm
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 994
Quote:
Originally Posted by bucky View Post
Not saying you are wrong however....

When the ball handler crosses the 3-pt line (pause vid at :08), do you feel that the defender is in LGP? At the same time, do you feel that the defender is still a secondary defender?

IMO, the defender established LGP well before the contact and at contact was considered to be a primary defender. (for outnumbering fast-breaks, defensive players are secondary defenders initially). I know why they called this a block however I feel it should have been PC.
I can see your point. I would not go so far as when the dribbler is at the 3 point line. Perhaps when he is at the free throw line. I can see why some people would go that route and I don't have a problem with it, its just not what I would do in this type of situation.
  #33 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 03:08pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
CBS
Wisconsin v Villanova
2nd half 36.4 seconds left
This is a team control foul!!!
Hope the crew gets this right.
Nope, they blew it and awarded FTs. A critical mistake.
A pet peeve of mine. I always go to my partners when they have whistles on this type of play. Unfortunately they aren't always willing to take the time to reprocess the play in their head and we end up shooting free throws.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
  #34 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 03:09pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by jTheUmp View Post
I was just watching that myself... I thought they were discussing if it would be a FF1 or not. The WI player reached out and grabbed the Villanova player and there was no possible way for him to "play the ball" as they say. I would've strongly considered calling an intentional foul under FED rules.
I believe that was the discussion.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
  #35 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 03:12pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Rookie View Post
Coverage on the missed BI play....Is the The Trail's call who was table side or the Center who was opposite table? Would this miss likely end this crew's run?
To me, a hand through the basket is best seen by the Lead.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR
  #36 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 03:23pm
Courageous When Prudent
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Posts: 14,840
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post


Peace
#1: I think it can be debated if initial LGP was when he placed his right foot on the RA.

#2: I think it is a Block regardless because he slid to his left after A1 was airborne.
__________________
A-hole formerly known as BNR

Last edited by Raymond; Mon Mar 20, 2017 at 03:27pm.
  #37 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 03:26pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
To me, a hand through the basket is best seen by the Lead.
I agree and he is probably not looking there. And I bet the other officials had some doubt as to where his hand was. Because he could have hand his hand in the net and not had a BI. But it was a miss and I think it was not tragic either. It probably surprised them as you do not see that every day for sure.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
  #38 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 03:57pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 678
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
A pet peeve of mine. I always go to my partners when they have whistles on this type of play. Unfortunately they aren't always willing to take the time to reprocess the play in their head and we end up shooting free throws.
I also do this, and often also end up not changing their minds. I do think it is possible on this type of play to gain control if there is a clear push of the ball rather than a traditional tip, though that isn't the case here.
  #39 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 04:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 14,995
Quote:
Originally Posted by frezer11 View Post
I also do this, and often also end up not changing their minds. I do think it is possible on this type of play to gain control if there is a clear push of the ball rather than a traditional tip, though that isn't the case here.
Be careful. Per the rules book control is gained only by holding or dribbling the ball. A bat or push of the ball may begin a dribble, but may not meet the standard for establishing control.
In such cases, the officials probably need to ask themselves, "Did the player dribble the ball?"
  #40 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 04:25pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 678
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
Be careful. Per the rules book control is gained only by holding or dribbling the ball. A bat or push of the ball may begin a dribble, but may not meet the standard for establishing control.
In such cases, the officials probably need to ask themselves, "Did the player dribble the ball?"
You're right, and the scenario where I would deem it a dribble is one in which the ball essentially comes to rest in the palm, and is redirected directly towards the hoop, not a tip. If that were the case and they were then fouled by the (former) offensive player, I would certainly consider this control and worthy of FTs.
  #41 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 04:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge View Post


Peace
Any chance of re-posting this? It isn't playing on YT, thanks.
  #42 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 04:54pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by dahoopref View Post
Any chance of re-posting this? It isn't playing on YT, thanks.
This play was flagged by YouTube for Copyright issues. I will try, but I have to figure out to get around this one. It was a longer video, maybe I will make it shorter. But something tells me that will not matter.

Funny I can see the video.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
  #43 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,013
Use this link and forward to 8:25. You can see the play that way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRTHabd0Gm0


IMO - Clearly not a dribble and clearly a TC foul. Also, clearly intentional foul on reach/grab. Ergo, crew did not adjudicate play correctly...twice.

(guess that is one reason why I am home at desk and not reffing the tourney)
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
  #44 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:16pm
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNewsRef View Post
I believe that was the discussion.
I don't remember exactly... but on the broadcast it was brought up... something like "we're waiting to get an explanation" and then someone (not sure if it was one of the game officials, the alternate, or someone involved with the monitor) said something to the effect of "trying to determine if team control had changed or not, and they determined that it had". Nothing was mentioned about a possible FF1.
  #45 (permalink)  
Old Mon Mar 20, 2017, 05:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by jTheUmp View Post
I don't remember exactly... but on the broadcast it was brought up... something like "we're waiting to get an explanation" and then someone (not sure if it was one of the game officials, the alternate, or someone involved with the monitor) said something to the effect of "trying to determine if team control had changed or not, and they determined that it had". Nothing was mentioned about a possible FF1.
That may have happened however the monitor can not be used to determine judgement calls.
__________________
If some rules are never enforced, then why do they exist?
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCAA Tournament Video Requests - Friday March 17 JRutledge Basketball 15 Mon Mar 20, 2017 04:03pm
NCAA Tournament Video Requests - Thursday March 16 Nevadaref Basketball 15 Sun Mar 19, 2017 06:17pm
ACC Tournament Plays (Video and requests) JRutledge Basketball 49 Mon Mar 13, 2017 10:59pm
SEC Tournament Plays (Requests and Video) JRutledge Basketball 11 Mon Mar 13, 2017 09:27am
Big 12 Tournament plays (Video and Requests) JRutledge Basketball 6 Fri Mar 10, 2017 08:50am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1