|
|||
Quote:
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
That's actually good enough for me, too. If I'd had the look he had, I might have made the same call. But this video screams foul to me.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
But this is a philosophy, and not a rule, yes?
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
Well what rule says otherwise? I can look at the incidental contact rule and clearly judge that the block did not prevent the shooter from doing normal movements. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
||||
Quote:
It's the case here in good HS hoops too. I only referenced NCAAM in the post cause that's the level the video is from. If a HS player gets ball first it makes a lot incidental.....as long as the defender doesn't annihilate the airborne shooter in the process. |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
||||
Quote:
I'm talking more about the out of balance defender that gets ball and then crushes the shooter.....but those pretty much call themselves. All I know is that when someone has a clean block up top and tries to sell "body down low" It's usually a weak call. |
|
|||
Quote:
Agreed, if he gets ball first. If he cleanly swats the ball into the wall followed by minimal contact of any kind, nobody wants a foul there, except the team taking the shot. But if the defender grazes the ball with a fingertip and then follow through with contact that draws blood, what do you have then? Obviously the OP is somewhere in between. To me, with the benefit of the replay, this meets the definition of a foul. As far as rule vs. philosophy, I'm just saying there is no provision which says: If the defender contacts the ball first, any subsequent contact shall be ruled incidental. I call it the roughing the kicker philosophy.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
There is no such rule in basketball.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Contact can be severe and not be a foul. Conversely, contact can be minimal and be a foul, and touching the ball is coincidental to both.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum. It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow. Lonesome Dove |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ohio State @ Michigan State Plays (Video) | JRutledge | Basketball | 10 | Wed Feb 15, 2017 01:14pm |
Texas @ Michigan plays (Video) | JRutledge | Basketball | 58 | Fri Dec 09, 2016 08:27am |
BYU @ Michigan State (Video) 2 GL Plays | JRutledge | Football | 9 | Mon Oct 10, 2016 05:43pm |
Michigan/Purdue...block/PC (video request) | JetMetFan | Basketball | 24 | Sun Mar 13, 2016 04:34pm |
Purdue @ Michigan, R2 | Scrapper1 | Volleyball | 2 | Sun Oct 12, 2008 07:33pm |