Does Continuation Apply?

[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by BigCat

Mark,

you are right that everyone but you and one other person believe w4 wasn't fouled in act of shooting. And you're right, we haven't read your 8 plays because it isn't necessary. Again, this isn't close.

Big Cat:

My experience as a rules interpreter and instructor tells me that when you tell me that you don't think it is necessary to study similar plays that you do not want to learn. Humor me, and study them, and tell the forum your rulings because I am very interested in your analysis.

MTD, Sr.

[BigCat]

Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.

Big Cat:

My experience as a rules interpreter and instructor tells me that when you tell me that you don't think it is necessary to study similar plays that you do not want to learn. Humor me, and study them, and tell the forum your rulings because I am very interested in your analysis.

MTD, Sr.

Mark,
My experience tells me that you are ignoring the way the game has been played for years and taking a basic play…not in the act of shooting, and trying to plug it into rules and reaching an absurd result. This isn't a close play.

Old dogs can't learn new tricks. I can learn but i can't learn anything from what you are espousing on this thread.