The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 04:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Unfortunately (in this case), intentional fouls are not ignored because the ball is dead. The just become T's. Intentional contact is always penalized.

Report the timeout. Report the T. Let the timeout occur. Resume after the timeout with FTs for the T.
Camron is correct. Also, restore the time to whatever the TO-granting official observed.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 10:52am
TODO: creative title here
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,250
Have a conference with your partners to establish the following:
1) which team called the time out. (Team B)
2) where was the status of the ball when the timeout was granted. (assuming it was before the throw-in started)
3) how much time should be put back on the clock. (2.8 seconds)
4) are we SURE the foul was intentional?

Assuming the answer to #4 is yes, do the following:
  • get both coaches together, tell them what's going to happen
  • Do everything in your power to avoid giving the Team B coach a T after he/she goes nuts. ("How can my kid get charged a T when he didn't know the ball was dead?")
  • put 2.8 back on the clock
  • report the intentional Technical foul to B1
  • grant Team B the timeout
  • resume the game with 2 shots for any member of Team A, and a division-line throw-in for A after the shots.
  • After the game ends, get out of the gym with much quickness.

If it's determined that the foul was NOT intentional:
  • get both coaches together, tell them what's going to happen
  • Do everything in your power to avoid giving the Team A coach a T after he/she goes nuts ("What do you mean that wasn't an intentional foul?")
  • put 2.8 back on the clock
  • grant Team B the timeout
  • Resume the game with a Team B throw-in on the end line.
  • After the game ends, get out of the gym with much quickness.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 11:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by jTheUmp View Post
Have a conference with your partners to establish the following:
1) which team called the time out. (Team B)
2) where was the status of the ball when the timeout was granted. (assuming it was before the throw-in started)
3) how much time should be put back on the clock. (2.8 seconds)
4) are we SURE the foul was intentional?

Assuming the answer to #4 is yes, do the following:
  • get both coaches together, tell them what's going to happen
  • Do everything in your power to avoid giving the Team B coach a T after he/she goes nuts. ("How can my kid get charged a T when he didn't know the ball was dead?")
  • put 2.8 back on the clock
  • report the intentional Technical foul to B1
  • grant Team B the timeout
  • resume the game with 2 shots for any member of Team A, and a division-line throw-in for A after the shots.
  • After the game ends, get out of the gym with much quickness.

If it's determined that the foul was NOT intentional:
  • get both coaches together, tell them what's going to happen
  • Do everything in your power to avoid giving the Team A coach a T after he/she goes nuts ("What do you mean that wasn't an intentional foul?")
  • put 2.8 back on the clock
  • grant Team B the timeout
  • Resume the game with a Team B throw-in on the end line.
  • After the game ends, get out of the gym with much quickness.
You forgot the most important part - call your assigner as soon as possible to alert him/her of the sh!tst0rm they are about to receive.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 12:31pm
beware big brother
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: illinois
Posts: 996
How exactly does one determine that a foul isn't an intentional foul after an official signals the foul as such?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 12:57pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
It's pretty hard to undo this train wreck after the fact.

Of course if the other official didn't signal an INT at the spot, it would be *easy* to walk that back / ignore that.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 02:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: In the offseason.
Posts: 12,263
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
How exactly does one determine that a foul isn't an intentional foul after an official signals the foul as such?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
It's pretty hard to undo this train wreck after the fact.

Of course if the other official didn't signal an INT at the spot, it would be *easy* to walk that back / ignore that.
Maybe it isn't so hard....why was it intentional? Excessive contact? Or just neutralizing an obvious advantage?

If the latter there was no advantage to be neutralized since the ball was dead. I could see retracting that intentional since it no longer meets the definition of intentional. If it was excessive contact, however, that doesn't change because the ball was dead...charge it.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com
Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 02:28pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Maybe it isn't so hard....why was it intentional? Excessive contact? Or just neutralizing an obvious advantage?

If the latter there was no advantage to be neutralized since the ball was dead. I could see retracting that intentional since it no longer meets the definition of intentional. If it was excessive contact, however, that doesn't change because the ball was dead...charge it.

yep
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 10, 2017, 12:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust View Post
Maybe it isn't so hard....why was it intentional? Excessive contact? Or just neutralizing an obvious advantage?

If the latter there was no advantage to be neutralized since the ball was dead. I could see retracting that intentional since it no longer meets the definition of intentional. If it was excessive contact, however, that doesn't change because the ball was dead...charge it.
This is an excellent point and wisely rules-based. But, say you walk back from the signal. How do you sum this up in one sentence or less to the incredulous coach who saw said signal?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 01:09pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnny d View Post
How exactly does one determine that a foul isn't an intentional foul after an official signals the foul as such?

Go to the guy that made the call and give him additional information. "Look, timeout was called and the ball was already dead. What have you got?"

Hopefully he'll say "Nothing, time out."
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 01:32pm
Rich's Avatar
Get away from me, Steve.
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 15,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
Go to the guy that made the call and give him additional information. "Look, timeout was called and the ball was already dead. What have you got?"

Hopefully he'll say "Nothing, time out."
Oh, right, you don't think a signal actually means anything.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 09, 2017, 02:08pm
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich View Post
Oh, right, you don't think a signal actually means anything.
Signal is a signal. Show me something that says a signal is irreversible.
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How far will you go to save a game (PART 2) RookieDude Basketball 55 Mon Jan 09, 2006 02:57pm
controling the game part 2 gordon30307 Baseball 15 Tue Aug 17, 2004 04:08pm
Game... Part 2 brandan89 Basketball 11 Thu Jul 15, 2004 11:48pm
It's part of the game.... DrakeM Basketball 30 Sat May 10, 2003 08:41pm
"Part of the game" JoeT Basketball 5 Thu Feb 10, 2000 04:27pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1