False Double Foul or Not?

[ODog]

Originally Posted by Adam

He meant that it's not one of the requirements for a FDF.

Nope. I meant exactly what Nevadaref said, word for word.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by ODog

Nope. I meant exactly what Nevadaref said, word for word.

I wasn't clarifying your post. I was clarifying BNR's post, which is who Nevadaref quoted.

[Camron Rust]

Just to clarify what Adam was clarifying about ODogs clarification of BNR's clarification of Nevada's comment on ODogs.....

Seriously, I have no idea who was saying what after all of that....but I think all were probably saying the same thing.

It IS a FDF both because the fouls were not at approximately the same time AND because it wasn't two opponents against each other. It only takes the absence of one to be a FDF but in this case, both elements of the double foul were absent, yet they occurred with no time having elapsed off the clock. The last point (the clock) is what leads to them being classified as a FDF instead of just two unrelated fouls.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

Just to clarify what Adam was clarifying about ODogs clarification of BNR's clarification of Nevada's comment on ODogs.....

Seriously, I have no idea who was saying what after all of that....but I think all were probably saying the same thing.

It IS a FDF both because the fouls were not at approximately the same time AND because it wasn't two opponents against each other. It only takes the absence of one to be a FDF but in this case, both elements of the double foul were absent, yet they occurred with no time having elapsed off the clock. The last point (the clock) is what leads to them being classified as a FDF instead of just two unrelated fouls.

I wish to concur with that clarification of ...

Save

[bob jenkins]

Originally Posted by Adam

I wasn't clarifying your post. I was clarifying BNR's post, which is who Nevadaref quoted.

So --- odog's post was a false double clarification?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by bob jenkins

So --- odog's post was a false double clarification?

by rule, yes.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Adam

by rule, yes.

I think that is a multiple foul.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

I think that is a multiple foul.

I take that personally.