|
|||
6 Players penalty
Last night for the first time ever I had a player from team visitor twice run out onto the court.
All we did was apply a team foul shot 2 and gave the offended team the ball. Texting friends this morning. They all seem to think that it is a team foul, player T and an indirect to the coach. The book doesn't seem to support this yet sometimes technicals and there different types aren't always clear so I wanted to ask my forum vets. Thanks in advance
__________________
BigT "The rookie" |
|
|||
Quote:
Now, if a sub simply runs onto the floor. That is a SUBSTITUTE technical. It applies toward his five fouls, it is one of his two techs, and toward team foul count. does not go to coach or affect his box in either case. Rule 10. |
|
|||
Quote:
Not all Ts are assessed to coach. You need to know what is and isn't. Last edited by BigCat; Wed Nov 30, 2016 at 11:17am. |
|
|||
The sub technical makes sense. Player fails to report and jumps on the court. I dont think I have ever seen it called. Ive seen too many tell them to go report.
This situation its a live ball just after we have started up after a dead ball and she runs onto the court. This seems more like the definition of team technical. Have I separated these well. Thanks everyone for the feedback. The summary was helpful for other things not really for this situation and how to decide which one to use.
__________________
BigT "The rookie" |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
When is the sixth player running on to the court and from where? Directly from their bench?
It's not. Why do you think it is?
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
Quote:
6 players on court usually occurs because someone doesn't come off the floor after someone else has properly reported. If someone does run on the floor during a live ball and you don't see it, nor does anybody else, and all you know is there are 6 for one team then you call the team technical. you don't know who came in without reporting. |
|
|||
BigCat now that makes sense to me. Your clarification has been awesome.
Thanks for answering ALL my questions and those situations so I know how to properly penalize.
__________________
BigT "The rookie" |
|
|||
Quote:
And the case book is a must. folks only reading the rule book are missing A LOT. Last edited by BigCat; Wed Nov 30, 2016 at 01:02pm. |
|
|||
I think that depends upon where they come from and what they do. This could also be a technical on bench personnel which would result in an indirect to the HC also.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
|
|||
Quote:
Welpe, what do you mean by the "where they come from" portion? thx Last edited by BigCat; Wed Nov 30, 2016 at 01:30pm. |
|
|||
Unsportsmanlike conduct isn't the only reason I'd stick a player as bench personnel. If he comes off the bench and "hot swaps" as play is live, I think there's an argument to make for making it an indirect to the HC also.
The penalty under 10-3 says that it is penalized if discovered before the ball becomes live. That tells me that fouls under 10-3 are intended to be applied only during dead ball situations when the substitute does not follow proper procedure.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interference Penalty right out of penalty box? | dinoian | Hockey | 2 | Wed Mar 04, 2015 11:21pm |
overlapped penalty: 25-yd penalty possible? | great | Football | 7 | Mon May 21, 2012 02:05pm |
POI Penalty? | The R | Basketball | 6 | Sun Nov 28, 2010 06:20pm |
Any penalty here. | Illini_Ref | Football | 18 | Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:29pm |
Penalty or not????? | Illini_Ref | Football | 39 | Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:48pm |