Four questions

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Camron Rust

No argument on here. I agree with all of the previous responses.

Jurassic would have disagreed and been correct.

[twtwo]

In #1 and #2: If the player had not dribbled prior to the attempted shot, the player would be allowed to dribble after recovering the fumble.

[deecee]

In 1&2 if you deem it a legal shot attempt then legal, otherwise violations on the shooter. An airborne shooter can only do 2 things shoot or pass, short of that or a defender touching the ball it's a violation in my book.

[Camron Rust]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Jurassic would have disagreed and been correct.

All he would have done was belittle the person who disagreed with him rather than do much to support his point...so I wouldn't put much weight into anything he said.

A fumble is an exception to all of the normal rules that limit what a player can do. It isn't integral to the main rules but the rules/cases around fumbles establish that travel rules and such are excepted when a player fumbles.