Inadvertent whistle? NCAA tourney- Indiana v Kentucky

[Raymond]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

Thanks for the info.

If you hear a whistle from the stands, stop the game, and restart from POI.

You can't figure that out by yourself?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Rich

I'm not sure what you're looking for -- it's not that complicated as I see it≥

If I'm one of the other two officials and I hear a whistle (from another official or the crowd), I like to hope I'm shutting things down. If I blow a whistle inadvertently, I'm shutting it down.

What else is there?

"If I blow a whistle inadvertently, I'm shutting it down."-- I think that this is a given. (Yet it might be the case that one of the NCAA guys didn't do that.)

What I think is up for debate is how to handle hearing a whistle which you didn't blow. If it came from a partner should one allow him to handle his business? If it came from the crowd is it better to let play continue or should the game be stopped. If stopped, under what rule?

[thedewed]

here's a teaching moment for that same ref that had the earlier IW, just had another one in my book. Here's why: IU shoots close to shot clock violation. he doesn't think it is one, but he thinks the ball misses the rim, wrong, and blows the whistle before the play finishes as an IU player gets the offensive rebound and dunks.

Hold that whistle for a second for that dunk and then blow your whistle if you think it might have missed the rim. that way, if you are wrong, you aren't penalizing IU. if you are right, give UK the ball.

The way he did it, if he was wrong and it did hit the rim, then you have a jump ball, horrific result.

He got lucky because the shot wasn't off in time. He wasn't blowing his whistle there, but on hitting the rim. It was pretty clear that it did hit the rim.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by thedewed

here's a teaching moment for that same ref that had the earlier IW, just had another one in my book. Here's why: IU shoots close to shot clock violation. he doesn't think it is one, but he thinks the ball misses the rim, wrong, and blows the whistle before the play finishes as an IU player gets the offensive rebound and dunks.

Hold that whistle for a second for that dunk and then blow your whistle if you think it might have missed the rim. that way, if you are wrong, you aren't penalizing IU. if you are right, give UK the ball.

The way he did it, if he was wrong and it did hit the rim, then you have a jump ball, horrific result.

He got lucky because the shot wasn't off in time. He wasn't blowing his whistle there, but on hitting the rim. It was pretty clear that it did hit the rim.

I don't agree with most of what this post says, but I would like to ask about the NCAAM rule for using the monitor on such situations. This occurred with 2:02 remaining. I believe that OOB calls can only be reviewed under 2 minutes. What about shot clock violations?

Mods: Perhaps better to move this and the post above to a new thread.

[frezer11]

Originally Posted by thedewed

here's a teaching moment for that same ref that had the earlier IW, just had another one in my book. Here's why: IU shoots close to shot clock violation. he doesn't think it is one, but he thinks the ball misses the rim, wrong, and blows the whistle before the play finishes as an IU player gets the offensive rebound and dunks.

Hold that whistle for a second for that dunk and then blow your whistle if you think it might have missed the rim. that way, if you are wrong, you aren't penalizing IU. if you are right, give UK the ball.

The way he did it, if he was wrong and it did hit the rim, then you have a jump ball, horrific result.

He got lucky because the shot wasn't off in time. He wasn't blowing his whistle there, but on hitting the rim. It was pretty clear that it did hit the rim.

And if I interpret the rule correctly, that review shouldn't have been allowed to occur because the try was unsuccessful. While I don't think I'm wrong on that, maybe someone can prove me right/wrong?

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

So what if it does. As long as the officials aren't being denigrated personally, I don't see anything wrong with critiquing their performances or decisions on individual plays. Plenty can be learned from just talking about basketball and if a situation sparks discussion, that's good.

Here's the thing. We've noticed a few posts (not just yours, but it was the latest) that seem to serve no purpose other than to just complain about the officials on the game. It may be considered a change, or it may not, but we're going to cut back on those as moderators.

Productive discussions are welcome.