Would this be 2 Technicals

[Ed Maeder]

After team B is given a delay warning for water on the floor after a time-out, earlier in the game. B1 reaches through the throw-in plane and hits the ball in the thrower-ins hands. Would this be a tech for the second delay of game and for hitting the ball also?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Ed Maeder

After team B is given a delay warning for water on the floor after a time-out, earlier in the game. B1 reaches through the throw-in plane and hits the ball in the thrower-ins hands. Would this be a tech for the second delay of game and for hitting the ball also?

10.3.10 SITUATION D:
A1 is out of bounds for a throw-in. B1 reaches through the boundary plane and knocks the ball out of A1's hands. Earlier in the game, Team B had received a team warning for delay.
RULING: Even though Team B had already been issued a warning for team delay, when B1breaks the plane and subsequently contacts the ball in the thrower's hand, it is considered all the same act and the end result is penalized. A player technical foul is assessed to B1; two free throws and a division line throw-in for Team A will follow. The previous warning for team delay still applies with any subsequent team delay resulting in a team technical foul. (4-47; 9-2-10 Penalty 3; 10-1-5c)

[Ed Maeder]

Thank You pretty much sums it up.

[David M]

Am I right in that it is a player T because he/she hit the ball while in the hand of the inbounder. It would have been a team T if it had been a plane violation.

[Smitty]

Originally Posted by David M

Am I right in that it is a player T because he/she hit the ball while in the hand of the inbounder. It would have been a team T if it had been a plane violation.

That is correct.

[BryanV21]

Would you say that breaking the plane of the OOB line is an immediate TF, and therefore any act following that (excluding flagrant fouls) is ignored? Leading to only one TF being called?

[Smitty]

Originally Posted by BryanV21

Would you say that breaking the plane of the OOB line is an immediate TF, and therefore any act following that (excluding flagrant fouls) is ignored? Leading to only one TF being called?

Read the case play in post #2.

[BryanV21]

Originally Posted by Smitty

Read the case play in post #2.

That says how to administer, not why. And I was curious about the "why".

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by David M

Am I right in that it is a player T because he/she hit the ball while in the hand of the inbounder. It would have been a team T if it had been a plane violation.

Yes, that is correct.

Originally Posted by BryanV21

Would you say that breaking the plane of the OOB line is an immediate TF, and therefore any act following that (excluding flagrant fouls) is ignored? Leading to only one TF being called?

Nope, that is not how these plays are to be officiated. The NFHS has instructed officials to ajudge the total action.

[Rich]

Flagrant...or intentional.

Apples...and oranges.