![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
I think there was confusion on the order of events. The way I read it is like this...
1. Tech on A30 for the push/hit after held ball call 2. Tech on B30 when she gets in face of A30 3. Tech on B30, her 2nd for going after A30 again So I believe you would penalize them in order of occurrence, meaning this... 1. 2 shots for Team B, with the lanes clear 2. 2 shots for Team A, with the lanes clear 3. 2 more shots for Team A, with the lanes clear 4. ball is awarded to Team A at the division line, on the opposite side of table NOTE: The held ball call is lost, as the following technical fouls negated it. Therefore the AP is not changed or even touched. |
|
|||
|
So A30 first pushed a player and then threw the ball at her? She's done in my game. The only thing I'm going back and forth on right now is do I just upgrade the first T to a flagrant after the ball throw or give 2 separate T's?
__________________
in OS I trust |
|
|||
|
Quote:
I also believe that the officials should have penalized both actions of A30. This is best done with two technical fouls. The second one may be deemed flagrant. That depends upon how the officials on the court view it. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Free throws | reffish | Basketball | 17 | Tue Feb 05, 2013 01:28am |
| Free throws | cmhjordan23 | Basketball | 4 | Thu Jan 06, 2011 05:10pm |
| Free throws | cmhjordan23 | Basketball | 23 | Mon Feb 15, 2010 01:21pm |
| Free Throws | nukewhistle | Basketball | 6 | Wed Nov 16, 2005 08:29pm |
| Why no free throws? | paulis | Basketball | 20 | Sun Mar 31, 2002 12:31am |